ISSN 2097-6046(网络)
ISSN 2096-7446(印刷)
CN 10-1655/R
主管:中国科学技术协会
主办:中华护理学会

中华急危重症护理杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (5): 389-395.doi: 10.3761/j.issn.2096-7446.2022.05.001

• 论著 •    下一篇

心血管危重症患者院内转运执行单的设计及应用研究

冯洁惠, 徐建宁, 朱旭菁, 潘英, 盛运云, 尤奥林   

  1. 311003 杭州市 浙江大学医学院附属第一医院心脏大血管外科(冯洁惠,朱旭菁,潘英,尤奥林),ICU(盛运云); 浙江中医药大学护理学院(徐建宁)
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-25 出版日期:2022-09-10 发布日期:2022-09-14
  • 作者简介:冯洁惠:女,硕士,副主任护师,E-mail:1503026@zju.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    浙江大学医学院附属第一医院护理学科建设科研项目(2022ZYHL010)

Design and application of an intra-hospital transport checklist for critically ill cardiovascular patients

FENG Jiehui, XU Jianning, ZHU Xujing, PAN Ying, SHENG Yunyun, YOU Aolin   

  1. Cardiovascular Surgery Department, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310003, China
  • Received:2022-03-25 Online:2022-09-10 Published:2022-09-14

摘要: 目的 设计并应用心血管危重症患者院内转运执行单,以提升转运安全。方法 通过文献回顾及半结构式访谈形成心血管危重症患者院内转运执行单初稿;运用德尔菲法对12名专家进行2轮函询,形成心血管危重症患者院内转运执行单,并对执行单进行信效度评价。便利选取浙江省某三级甲等医院心脏大血管外科、心血管内科各1个护理单元,2021年9月—10月67例次转运患者为对照组,2021年11月—12月72例次转运患者为试验组。试验组在常规转运的基础上采用心血管危重症患者院内转运执行单,对照组采用常规转运护理。比较两组转运不良事件的发生率和转运用时的差异。结果 2轮专家函询问卷回收率均为100%;专家权威系数分别为0.811、0.856;专家协调系数分别为0.363和0.387(P<0.05);执行单各条目Kappa值为0.733~1.000,平均为0.803(P<0.05);执行单条目内容效度指数为0.810~1.000,整体内容效度指数为0.912。设计的心血管危重症患者院内转运执行单包含6项一级指标、22项二级指标、50项三级指标。临床应用后,试验组转运期间部分病情/技术相关不良事件发生率、转运前准备用时及途中用时均低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 心血管危重症患者院内转运执行单较为科学、可靠,可缩短转运用时,有助于转运关键环节的有效落实,进而提升转运安全。

关键词: 病人转送, 心血管疾病护理, 危重病护理, 表格和记录管理, 安全管理

Abstract: Objective To construct and apply intra-hospital transport checklist for critically ill cardiovascular patients to improve transport safety. Methods The preliminary draft of intra-hospital transport checklist for critically ill cardiovascular patients was developed based on literature review and semi-structured interviews,and the Delphi method was used to conduct 2 rounds of consultation with 12 experts,the final intra-hospital transport checklist for critically ill cardiovascular patients was formed. After evaluating the reliability and validity of the checklist,it was carried out in a cardiovascular surgical ward and a cardiovascular ward of a tertiary class A hospital in Zhejiang Province from September to December 2021. 67 cases of transport from September to October were regarded as control group,72 cases from November to December were experimental group. The experimental group used intra-hospital transport checklist for critically ill cardiovascular patients on the basis of routine transport,while the control group used routine transport nursing. The rate of adverse events and transport time were compared between the two groups. Results The response rate of the 2 rounds of expert consultation were 100%. Expert authority coefficients was 0.811 and 0.856. And expert coordination coefficients were 0.363 and 0.387(P<0.05). Kappa value of each item ranged from 0.733 to 1.000, with average of 0.803(P<0.05). The content validity index at the level of items ranged from 0.810 to 1.000, and the index of whole checklist was 0.912. The checklist contained 6 first-level indicators,22 second-level indicators,and 50 third-level indicators. After application of the checklist,the incidence of some disease/technology-related adverse events, the preparation time and transit time of experimental group were lower than those of control group(P<0.05). Conclusion The construction of transport checklist was scientific and reliable. It can shorten the transport time,and is helpful for the effective implementation of the key link of transport,then improve transport safety.

Key words: Transportation of Patients, Cardiovascular Nursing, Critical Care Nursing, Forms and Records Control, Safety Management