ISSN 2097-6046(网络)
ISSN 2096-7446(印刷)
CN 10-1655/R
主管:中国科学技术协会
主办:中华护理学会

中华急危重症护理杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (7): 820-826.doi: 10.3761/j.issn.2096-7446.2026.07.007

• 急危重症疼痛管理专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

ICU护士操作性疼痛管理知信行问卷的编制及信效度检验

黄洁(), 劳月文*(), 陈香萍, 章燕飞, 张敏燕, 江媚, 宫晓艳   

  1. 浙江大学医学院附属邵逸夫医院护理部 杭州市 310016
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-01 出版日期:2026-07-10 发布日期:2026-07-01
  • 通讯作者: *劳月文,E-mail:3317079@zju.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:黄洁:女,本科,护师,E-mail:2870703586@qq.com
    作者贡献声明

    黄洁:论文撰写;劳月文、陈香萍、宫晓艳:研究设计、查阅文献、统计学分析、研究指导、论文修改、专家函询;章燕飞、张敏燕、江媚:数据收集、数据整理

Development and validation of a knowledge,attitude,and practice questionnaire on procedural pain management among ICU nurses

HUANG Jie(), LAO Yuewen*(), CHEN Xiangping, ZHANG Yanfei, ZHANG Minyan, JIANG Mei, GONG Xiaoyan   

  1. Nursing DepartmentSir Run Run Shaw Hospital,Zhejiang University School of MedicineHangzhou 310016, China
  • Received:2025-12-01 Online:2026-07-10 Published:2026-07-01
  • Contact: *LAO Yuewen,E-mail:3317079@zju.edu.cn

摘要:

目的 编制ICU护士操作性疼痛管理知信行问卷并检验其信效度,为评估ICU护士操作性疼痛管理知信行提供可靠的研究工具。方法 基于知信行理论,通过文献分析、专家函询形成ICU护士操作性疼痛管理知信行初始调查问卷。采用便利抽样法,于2025年7月—8月,选取浙江省5所三级甲等医院的800名ICU护士开展调查,对量表进行信效度检验。结果 发放问卷800份,回收有效问卷787份,有效问卷回收率为98.38%。最终形成的问卷包括知识、态度、行为3个维度,共36个条目。2轮函询专家权威系数分别为0.88、0.90,肯德尔和谐系数为0.280、0.450,积极系数均为100%。问卷的内容效度为0.875~1.000,平均内容效度为0.901。因子分析表明问卷结构良好,累计方差贡献率为72.56%,验证性因子分析模型拟合佳。问卷总的Cronbach’s α系数为0.972,分半信度为0.843,重测信度为0.915。结论 该研究编制的ICU护士操作性疼痛管理知信行问卷具有良好的信度与效度,可作为ICU护士操作性疼痛管理知信行水平的测评工具。

关键词: 重症监护病房, 操作性疼痛, 问卷编制, 信度, 效度

Abstract:

Objective To develop a questionnaire on knowledge,attitude,and practice(KAP) regarding procedural pain management among ICU nurses and examine its reliability and validity,so as to provide a reliable tool for assessing the KAP levels in this area. Methods Based on the KAP theoretical framework,the initial questionnaire was developed through literature review and Delphi expert consultation. A convenience sampling method was used to select 800 clinical nurses from five tertiary hospitals in Zhejiang Province for a survey conducted from July to August 2025,and reliability and validity tests were performed. Results A total of 800 questionnaires were distributed,yielding 787 valid responses,for an effective response rate of 98.38%. The final questionnaire included 36 items across knowledge,attitude,and practice dimensions. The expert authority coefficients for the two Delphi rounds were 0.88 and 0.90,with Kendall’s W of 0.280 and 0.450,and positive coefficients of 100% for both rounds. The content validity index ranged from 0.875 to 1.000,with an average of 0.901. Factor analysis indicated good structural validity,with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 72.56% and a good model fit in the confirmatory factor analysis. The Cronbach’s α of the questionnaire was 0.972 for the overall scale,split-half reliability was 0.843,and test-retest reliability was 0.915. Conclusion The KAP Questionnaire about procedural pain management exhibits good reliability and validity,and can serve as a reliable instrument for evaluating ICU nurses’ knowledge,attitudes,and practices in procedural pain management.

Key words: Intensive Care Units, Procedural Pain, Scale Development, Reliability, Validity