ISSN 2097-6046(网络)
ISSN 2096-7446(印刷)
CN 10-1655/R
主管:中国科学技术协会
主办:中华护理学会

中华急危重症护理杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (3): 337-343.doi: 10.3761/j.issn.2096-7446.2026.03.016

• 质量与安全 • 上一篇    下一篇

家属版重症监护疼痛观察工具的汉化及信效度检验

肖艳萍(), 陈香萍, 劳月文*(), 喻薇, 刘沛奇, 朱冰燕, 胡心茹   

  1. 浙江大学医学院附属邵逸夫医院护理部 杭州市 310000
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-03 出版日期:2026-03-10 发布日期:2026-03-02
  • 通讯作者: 劳月文 E-mail:xyp@srrsh.com;3317079@zju.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:肖艳萍:女,本科,护师,E-mail:xyp@srrsh.com
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省医药卫生科技计划科研项目(2024KY1101)

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool for Families

XIAO Yanping(), CHEN Xiangping, LAO Yuewen*(), YU Wei, LIU Peiqi, ZHU Bingyan, HU Xinru   

  1. Nursing DepartmentSir Run Run Shaw Hospital,Zhejiang University School of MedicineHangzhou 310000, China
  • Received:2025-04-03 Online:2026-03-10 Published:2026-03-02
  • Contact: LAO Yuewen E-mail:xyp@srrsh.com;3317079@zju.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    Zhejiang Medical Research Project(2024KY1101)

摘要:

目的 对家属版重症监护疼痛观察工具(Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool for Families,CPOT-Fam)进行汉化和文化调适,并在ICU患者家属中检验其信效度。方法 按照Brislin翻译模型对CPOT-Fam进行直译和回译,经原作者审核、文化调适和预调查形成中文版CPOT-Fam,采用便利抽样法,选择2025年1月—3月入住杭州市某三级甲等医院成人综合ICU 100例患者的家属作为调查对象,验证量表的信效度。结果 中文版CPOT-Fam的内部一致性信度Cronbach’s α系数为0.786。家属采用CPOT-Fam与护士采用重症监护疼痛观察工具(Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool,CPOT)进行疼痛评分的总体一致性为高度(κ=0.681,95%CI:0.541~0.786),各条目一致性中,面部表情(κ=0.814)最高,肢体活动(κ=0.601)最低。CPOT-Fam的内容效度指数为0.99,CPOT-Fam各条目的内容效度指数为0.88~1.00。效标效度相关系数为0.783(P<0.001)。结论 中文版CPOT-Fam具有良好的信效度,可作为中国文化背景下ICU患者家属参与疼痛评估的有效工具。

关键词: 重症监护, 疼痛评估, 家属, 量表汉化

Abstract:

Objective To translate and culturally adapt the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool for Families (CPOT-Fam) and validate its psychometric properties among family members of ICU patients.Methods The CPOT-Fam was translated using the Brislin translation model,including forward and back-translation,followed by review by the original authors,cultural adaptation,and pilot testing to finalize the Chinese version. From January to March 2025,100 family members of adult patients in a general ICU of a tertiary hospital in Zhejiang Province were recruited via convenience sampling to validate the scale’s reliability and validity.Results The internal consistency reliability Cronbach’s α coefficient for the Chinese version of CPOT-Fam was 0.786. The overall agreement between family members(CPOT-Fam) and nurses(CPOT) for pain assessment was substantial(κ= 0.681,95%CI:0.541-0.786). Among individual items,facial expression showed the highest agreement(κ=0.814),while body movements had the lowest(κ=0.601). The scale-level content validity index(S-CVI) was 0.99,with item-level CVI(I-CVI) ranging from 0.88 to 1.00. The criterion validity correlation coefficient was 0.783(P<0.001).Conclusion The Chinese version of CPOT-Fam exhibits satisfactory reliability and validity,serving as an effective tool for family members to participate in pain assessment for ICU patients in a Chinese cultural context.

Key words: Critical Care, Pain Assessment, Family Members, Scale Translation