ISSN 2097-6046(网络)
ISSN 2096-7446(印刷)
CN 10-1655/R
主管:中国科学技术协会
主办:中华护理学会

中华急危重症护理杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (4): 428-433.doi: 10.3761/j.issn.2096-7446.2025.04.007

• 创伤急救护理专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

严重创伤救治护理质量评价指标体系的构建及适用性分析

陈慧娟(), 黄伟, 刘月, 赵飞凡, 程晶, 孙丽冰()   

  1. 100044 北京市 北京大学人民医院创伤救治中心(陈慧娟,黄伟,孙丽冰),急诊科(刘月),重症监护病房(赵飞凡);华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院门诊部办公室(程晶)
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-31 出版日期:2025-04-10 发布日期:2025-04-02
  • 通讯作者: 孙丽冰,E-mail:sun_libing@163.com
  • 作者简介:陈慧娟:女,硕士,副主任护师,副护士长,E-mail:bdchenhuijuan@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    北京大学人民医院研究与发展基金(项目编号RDN2022-06)

Construction and applicability analysis of nursing quality evaluation index system of severe trauma care

CHEN Huijuan(), HUANG Wei, LIU Yue, ZHAO Feifan, CHENG Jing, SUN Libing()   

  1. Trauma Medicine Center,Peking University People’s Hospital,Beijing,100044,China
  • Received:2024-07-31 Online:2025-04-10 Published:2025-04-02

摘要:

目的 构建严重创伤救治护理质量评价指标,为全程创伤救治护理质量监测及控制提供评价依据。方法 以“结构-过程-结果”三维质量评价模型为框架,基于文献分析、专家函询及层次分析法确定严重创伤救治护理质量评价指标内容及各指标权重。结果 共纳入国家、省、市、县四级创伤救治体系各层级代表16所医院的20名医疗、护理、管理专家开展2轮函询,有效回收率分别为100%、95%;专家权威系数分别为0.897、0.911;变异系数为0.045~0.291和0.045~0.217,肯德尔和谐系数为0.273和0.206(P<0.001)。共形成54个严重创伤救治护理质量评价指标,其中结构指标19个、过程指标25个、结果指标10个。结论 该研究构建的评价指标科学性、实用性较强,可为严重创伤救治护理质量控制提供客观、科学、有效的评价依据,为创伤数据库及以数据为导向的创伤救治质控体系建设提供数据支持。

关键词: 创伤, 创伤救治中心, 护理, 质量控制, 指标, 德尔菲法

Abstract:

Objective To construct nursing quality evaluation index system for severe trauma care and provide an evaluation basis for the monitoring and control of nursing quality in the whole process of trauma care. Methods Based on the frame work of the three-dimensional “structure-process-outcome” quality model,this study used literature review,Delphi method and analytic hierarchy to determine the content and the weight of indicators. Results A total of 20 medical,nursing and management experts from 16 hospitals at national,provincial,city and county trauma care systems were included,and two rounds of consultations were conducted. The effective recovery rates were 100% and 95%,respectively. The expert authority coefficients were 0.897 and 0.911,respectively. The variation coefficients of each item ranged from 0.045~0.291 and 0.045~0.217. The Kendall harmony coefficients were 0.273 and 0.206(P<0.001). In this study,a total of 54 nursing quality indicators for severe trauma care were formed,including 19 structural indicators,25 process indicators and 10 result indicators. Conclusion The evaluation indicators are scientific and practical,which can provide objective,scientific and effective evaluation basis for the quality control of trauma care,and provide data support for the construction of trauma database and data-oriented trauma treatment quality control system.

Key words: Severe Trauma, Trauma Center, Nursing Care, Quality Control, Indicators, Delphi Method