ISSN 2097-6046(网络)
ISSN 2096-7446(印刷)
CN 10-1655/R
主管:中国科学技术协会
主办:中华护理学会

中华急危重症护理杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (7): 805-811.doi: 10.3761/j.issn.2096-7446.2025.07.006

• 俯卧位通气患者护理专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

俯卧位机械通气患者早期肠内营养支持审查指标的制订及障碍因素分析

王冬雪(), 孙丽军, 龚瑛, 吴林静, 郑薇亮()   

  1. 361006 厦门市 厦门大学附属心血管病医院重症医学科(王冬雪,孙丽军,龚瑛),护理部(吴林静),康复中心(郑薇亮)
  • 收稿日期:2024-08-14 出版日期:2025-07-10 发布日期:2025-07-04
  • 通讯作者: 郑薇亮 E-mail:1176978857@qq.com;175711337@qq.com
  • 作者简介:王冬雪:女,本科,护师,E-mail:1176978857@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所医疗质量(循证)管理研究项目(YLZLXZ24G102)

Development of audit indicators and analysis of barriers for early enteral nutrition support in prone mechanical ventilation patients

WANG Dongxue(), SUN Lijun, GONG Ying, WU Linjing, ZHENG Weiliang()   

  1. Department of Critical Care Medicine,Xiamen Cardiovascular Hospital Xiamen University,Xiamen,361006,China
  • Received:2024-08-14 Online:2025-07-10 Published:2025-07-04
  • Contact: ZHENG Weiliang E-mail:1176978857@qq.com;175711337@qq.com

摘要:

目的 了解俯卧位机械通气患者早期肠内营养支持临床应用现状,制订审查指标,分析障碍及促进因素,并制订变革策略。 方法 通过前期证据总结,纳入16条最佳证据,并制订了20个审查指标。根据临床基线审查结果,分析障碍及促进因素,制订相应变革策略。 结果 20个审查指标中,仅1个指标临床执行率为100%,15个指标临床执行率为0,其他指标执行率为8.7%~95.7%。障碍因素主要为缺乏规范化的管理流程及方案、医护人员缺乏相关知识及培训、缺乏多学科合作等,促进因素主要为管理者领导力强、医院具有丰富的循证实践经验和成熟的专科护士队伍、信息化水平高。 结论 俯卧位机械通气患者早期肠内营养支持的最佳证据与临床实践存在较大差距,应充分利用促进因素、克服障碍因素,实施变革策略,促进证据向临床实践有效转化。

关键词: 俯卧位, 肠内营养, 审查指标, 障碍因素, 循证护理学

Abstract:

Objective To comprehensively evaluate the current status of clinical application of evidence for early enteral nutrition support in ICU prone mechanically ventilated patients and to develop audit indicators,and to analyze the barriers and facilitators,and to formulate strategies for change. Methods Through the evidence summary,16 items of best evidence were included,and 20 audit indicators were developed. Based on the results of the baseline audit of clinical practice,the barriers and facilitators were analyzed,and change strategies were developed. Results Among the 20 indicators reviewed in this study,the clinical implementation rate of only one indicator was 100%,15 indicators were 0,and the range of implementation rates for the other indicators was 8.7%~95.7%. The main barriers were the lack of standardized management procedures,lack of relevant knowledge and training for medical staff,lack of multidisciplinary cooperation. While facilitators were mainly strong leadership of managers,hospitals with rich experience in evidence-based practice and a mature team of specialist nurses,and high level of information technology. Conclusion There is a large gap between the best evidence for early enteral nutrition support for ICU mechanically ventilated patients in the prone position and clinical practice. We should fully utilize the facilitators,overcome the barriers,and implement strategies for change,to promote effective translation of evidence to clinical practice.

Key words: Prone Position, Enteral Nutrition, Audit Indicators, Barriers, Evidence-Based Nursing