NICU终末期患儿安宁疗护质量评价量表的编制及信效度检验

doi:10.3761/j.issn.2096-7446.2024.12.004

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的编制NICU终末期患儿安宁疗护质量评价量表（Neonatal Intensive Care Unit-Palliative Care Quality Assessment Scale, NICU-PCQAS）,并检验其信效度,为测评NICU患儿安宁疗护质量提供适用工具。方法在新生儿“优逝”理论框架指导下,借鉴成人死亡质量量表,通过文献回顾和半结构式访谈构建量表条目池;通过德尔菲专家函询、预调查形成量表初稿。采用方便抽样法,对2021年7月—2023年7月江苏省、浙江省、四川省等3所综合医院、9所妇幼保健院、6所儿童医院的344例NICU患儿的安宁疗护质量进行调查,并进行项目分析和信效度检验。结果量表包括5个维度,20个条目。探索性因子分析共提取5个公因子,可解释总变异的76.35%;验证性因子分析结果显示,量表结构模型的拟合指标良好（χ²/df=1.25、残差均方根=0.03、增值拟合指数=0.99、拟合优度指数=0.99、近似误差均方根=0.03）。量表条目水平的内容效度指数为0.78~1.00,量表水平的内容效度指数为0.97。总量表的Cronbach‘s α系数为0.92,折半系数为0.75,各维度的Cronbach‘s α系数为0.86~0.93,折半系数为0.87~0.92。结论 NICU-PCQAS信效度良好,可用于测评NICU患儿的安宁疗护质量,为NICU新生儿安宁疗护的开展提供依据。

关键词: 安宁疗护, 死亡质量, 新生儿重症监护病房, 量表编制, 信度, 效度

Abstract: Objective To develop the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit-Palliative Care Quality Assessment Scale（NICU-PCQAS） and evaluate its reliability and validity,with the aim of providing an appropriate tool for assessing the quality of palliative care in NICU infants. Methods Guided by the conceptual model of a good death in the NICU,and referring to the Adult Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire,the initial item pool was constructed through literature review and semi-structured interviews. The draft of the NICU-PCQAS was developed using a Delphi methodology and pre-investigation. Convenient sampling was used to investigate and evaluate the quality of palliative care of 344 neonates in 3 general hospitals,9 maternal and child health hospitals,and 6 children‘s hospitals in Jiangsu Province,Zhejiang Province,and Sichuan Province from July 2021 to July 2023. The data were then analyzed for item analysis,testing of reliability and validity. Results A 5-domain,20-item NICU-PCQAS was developed. Exploratory factor analysis identified five factors accounting for 76.35% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a good fit（χ²/df=1.25,RMR=0.03,IFI=0.99,CFI=0.99,RMSEA=0.03）. The I-CVI ranged from 0.78 to 1.00,and the S-CVI was 0.97. The Cronbach‘s α was 0.92,and the Spearman-Brown coefficient was 0.75. Domain-specific Cronbach‘s α ranged from 0.86 to 0.93,and Spearman-Brown coefficients ranged from 0.87 to 0.92. Conclusion The NICU-PCQAS is reliable and valid,suitable for assessing the quality of palliative care in NICU infants,and supports the development of palliative care in NICUs.

Key words: Palliative Care, Quality of Dying and Death, Intensive Care Units,Neonatal, Scale Development, Reliability, Validity

王草源, 任义梅, 陈方圆. NICU终末期患儿安宁疗护质量评价量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 中华急危重症护理杂志, 2024, 5(12): 1081-1087.

WANG Caoyuan, REN Yimei, CHEN Fangyuan. Development and psychometric tests of the Palliative Care Quality Assessment Scale in the neonatal intensive care setting[J]. Chinese Journal of Emergency and Critical Care Nursing, 2024, 5(12): 1081-1087.

参考文献

[1] World Health Organization.Neonatal deaths and mortality rate (0 to 27 days) By WHO region[EB/OL].(2023-03-01)[2023-10-15].https://apps.who.int/gho/data/node.main.CHILDMORTNEONATAL?lang=en.
[2] 李琳玉,孙畅,陈晓飞,等. 新生儿重症监护室护士对死亡态度与安宁疗护教育需求的相关性分析[J]. 中华急危重症护理杂志,2022,3(5):431-436.
Li LY,Sun C,Chen XF,et al.Correlation analysis between death attitude and hospice education needs of the nurses in neonatal intensive care unit[J]. Chin J Emerg Crit Care Nurs,2022,3(5):431-436.
[3] 李梦婷,陈朔晖,陈晓飞. 新生儿重症监护室安宁疗护的研究进展[J]. 中华急危重症护理杂志,2021,2(2):156-161.
Li MT,Chen SH,Chen XF.Review on hospice care in neonatal intensive care units[J]. Chin J Emerg Crit Care Nurs,2021,2(2):156-161.
[4] Sellers DE,Dawson R,Cohen-Bearak A,et al.Measuring the quality of dying and death in the pediatric intensive care setting:the clinician PICU-QODD[J]. J Pain Symptom Manage,2015,49(1):66-78.
[5] Moslemi M,Nikfarid L,Nourian M,et al.Translation,cultural,and age-related adaptation and psychometric properties of Persian version of “quality of dying and death” in nurses working in neonatal intensive care units[J]. Indian J Palliat Care,2020,26(1):34-39.
[6] 游彤阳. 遵义市某三级医院ICU护士视角下患者死亡质量现状及影响因素研究[D]. 遵义:遵义医科大学,2021.
You TY.The study on the status and influencing factors of quality of dying and death in a tertiary hospital in Zunyi:from the perspective of intensive care nurses[D]. Zunyi:Zunyi Medical University,2021.
[7] Knapp CA,Madden VL,Curtis C,et al.Assessing non-response bias in pediatric palliative care research[J]. Palliat Med,2010,24(3):340-347.
[8] Broden EG,Deatrick J,Ulrich C,et al.Defining a “good death” in the pediatric intensive care unit[J]. Am J Crit Care,2020
29(2):111-121.
[9] Fortney CA,Steward DK.A new framework to evaluate the quality of a neonatal death[J]. Death Stud,2014,38(1/2/3/4/5):294-301.
[10] Patrick DL,Engelberg RA,Curtis JR.Evaluating the quality of dying and death[J]. J Pain Symptom Manage,2001,22(3):717-726.
[11] 陈平雁. 临床试验中样本量确定的统计学考虑[J]. 中国卫生统计,2015,32(4):727-731,733.
Chen PY.Statistical consideration of sample size determination in clinical trials[J]. Chin J Health Stat,2015,32(4):727-731,733.
[12] 吴明隆. 结构方程模型:AMOS的操作与应用[M]. 2版. 重庆:重庆大学出版社,2010.
Wu ML.Structural equation model:operation and application of AMOS[M]. 2nd ed. Chongqing:Chongqing University Press,2010.
[13] 史静琤,莫显昆,孙振球,等. 量表编制中内容效度指数的应用[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版),2012,37(2):152-155.
Shi JZ,Mo XK,Sun ZQ,et al.Content validity index in scale development[J]. J Cent South Univ(Med Sci),2012,37(2):152-155.
[14] 蒋小花,沈卓之,张楠楠,等. 问卷的信度和效度分析[J]. 现代预防医学,2010,37(3):429-431.
Jiang XH,Shen ZZ,Zhang NN,et al.Reliability and validity analysis of questionnaire[J]. Mod Prev Med,2010,37(3):429-431.
[15] 曾纪丽,罗丹,程晓琳,等. ICU生命末期患者死亡质量量表的汉化及信效度评价[J]. 医学与哲学,2020,41(1):41-45.
Zeng JL,Luo D,Cheng XL,et al.Chinese version of the quality of dying and death questionnaire for end-of-life patients in ICU and its reliability and validity evaluation[J]. Med Philos,2020,41(1):41-45.