主动脉外科术后患者脊髓损伤预防及管理的最佳证据总结

doi:10.3761/j.issn.2096-7446.2024.11.016

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的汇总主动脉外科术后患者脊髓损伤预防及管理的最佳证据,以期为临床实践提供参考。方法针对主动脉外科术后患者脊髓损伤预防及管理相关问题,系统检索计算机决策系统、指南网站、专业协会网站和数据库中的临床决策、最佳实践、证据总结、指南、专家共识、系统评价、随机对照试验和类试验研究等,检索时限为建库至2022年12月31日。由2名研究人员对文献进行筛选和质量评价,对纳入文献进行资料提取与证据汇总。结果共纳入文献22篇,汇总出20条主动脉外科术后患者脊髓损伤预防及管理的证据,包括脊髓损伤的评估与监测、风险因素识别、预防与管理措施3个方面的证据。结论该研究总结了目前关于主动脉外科术后脊髓损伤预防及管理的最佳证据,可为临床医疗及护理实践提供循证依据。目前证据大多来自于国外,未来仍需进一步开展国内护理领域相关高质量研究。通过应用最佳证据,用科学的方法预防和管理主动脉外科术后脊髓损伤,提升护理质量,改善患者结局。

关键词: 主动脉疾病, 脊髓损伤, 循证护理学, 证据总结, 预防

Abstract: Objective To summarize the best evidence for prevention and management of spinal cord injury in patients after aortic surgery,so as to provide reference for clinical practice. Methods For the prevention and management of spinal cord injury in patients after aortic surgery,the clinical decisions,best practices,evidence summaries,guidelines,expert consensuses,systematic reviews,randomized controlled trials,and quasi-experimental studies were systematically searched in computer decision-supporting system,guideline websites,association official websites and databases. The search deadline was from database establishment to December 31,2022. Two researchers screened and evaluated the methodological quality of included literature,and extracted and summarized the evidence. Results Twenty-two articles were included in the study. Three dimensions with 20 items of evidence were summarized,including assessment and monitoring of spinal cord injury,risk factors identification,prevention and management strategies. Conclusion This study summarized the best evidence on the prevention and management of spinal cord injury after aortic surgery,which could provide evidence-based references for clinical and nursing practice. Most of the current evidence came from abroad,therefore,it is necessary to further carry out high-quality nursing researches in China. Through the application of the best evidence,scientific methods are expected to prevent and manage spinal cord injury after aortic surgery,and improve the quality of nursing and outcomes of patients.

Key words: Aortic Disease, Spinal Cord Injury, Evidence-Based Nursing, Evidence Summary, Prevention

庄菲斐, 史宇欣, 郭聪慧, 吴荣. 主动脉外科术后患者脊髓损伤预防及管理的最佳证据总结[J]. 中华急危重症护理杂志, 2024, 5(11): 1045-1051.

ZHUANG Feifei, SHI Yuxin, GUO Conghui, WU Rong. Evidence summary for prevention and management of spinal cord injury after aortic surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Emergency and Critical Care Nursing, 2024, 5(11): 1045-1051.

参考文献

[1] 朱亮,朱永宏. DeBakey Ⅲ型主动脉夹层腔内隔绝术后主动脉重塑的功能学及形态学研究[J]. 中国介入心脏病学杂志,2016,24(12):696-699.
Zhu L,Zhu YH.Functional and morphological study on aortic remodeling after endovascular exclusion of DeBakey Ⅲ aortic dissection[J]. Chin J Interv Cardiol,2016,24(12):696-699.
[2] 张利丽,耿利娜,李佳娜,等. Stanford A型主动脉夹层术后并发症发生率Meta分析[J]. 陕西医学杂志,2022,51(11):1453-1457.
Zhang LL,Geng LN,Li JN,et al.Meta-analysis of incidence of postoperative complications in Stanford type A aortic dissection[J]. Shaanxi Med J,2022,51(11):1453-1457.
[3] Coselli JS,Green SY,Price MD,et al.Spinal cord deficit after 1114 extent II open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repairs[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2020,159(1):1-13.
[4] 周宏艳,王冀,袁素,等. 规范化综合性脊髓保护措施能够降低主动脉手术患者围手术期脊髓损伤发生率:8年回顾性分析[J]. 中华危重病急救医学,2019,31(5):633-636.
Zhou HY,Wang J,Yuan S,et al.Standardized multidisciplinary spinal cord protection strategies reduce spinal cord injury during perioperative period of aortic surgery:an 8-year retrospective analysis[J]. Chin Crit Care Med,2019,31(5):633-636.
[5] 王苏德娜,王春蓉,高宇晨,等. 胸腹降主动脉置换术后发生脊髓损伤危险因素分析[J]. 中国分子心脏病学杂志,2021,21(1):3715-3718.
Wang SDN,Wang CR,Gao YC,et al.Analysis of risk factors for spinal cord injury after descending thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysm repair[J]. Mol Cardiol China,2021,21(1):3715-3718.
[6] 朱政,胡雁,邢唯杰,等. 不同类型循证问题的构成[J]. 护士进修杂志,2017,32(21):1991-1994.
Zhu Z,Hu Y,Xing WJ,et al.The composition of different types of evidence based problems[J]. J Nurses Train,2017,32(21):1991-1994.
[7] 周芬,郝玉芳,丛雪,等. 指南研究与评价工具AGREE Ⅱ及各领域分值的补充解释及思考[J]. 护理学报,2018,25(18):56-58.
Zhou F,Hao YF,Cong X,et al.Supplementary explanation and thinking of AGREE Ⅱ,a guide research and evaluation tool,and scores in various fields[J]. J Nurs China,2018,25(18):56-58.
[8] The Joanna Briggs Institute. Critical appraisal tools[EB/OL].[2023-03-03]. https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools.
[9] 王春青,胡雁. JBI证据预分级及证据推荐级别系统(2014版)[J]. 护士进修杂志,2015,30(11):964-967.
Wang CQ,Hu Y.JBI evidence pre-classification and evidence rank system(2014 Edition)[J]. J Nurses Train,2015,30(11):964-967.
[10] Isselbacher EM,Preventza O,Hamilton Black J 3rd,et al. 2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease:a report of the American heart association/american college of cardiology joint committee on clinical practice guidelines[J]. Circulation,2022,146(24):e334-e482.
[11] MacGillivray TE,Gleason TG,Patel HJ,et al. The society of thoracic surgeons/american association for thoracic surgery clinical practice guidelines on the management of type B aortic dissection[J]. Ann Thorac Surg,2022,113(4):1073-1092.
[12] Upchurch GR Jr,Escobar GA,Azizzadeh A,et a. Society for Vascular Surgery clinical practice guidelines of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for descending thoracic aortic aneurysms[J]. J Vasc Surg,2021,73(1S):55S-83S.
[13] Riambau V,Böckler D,Brunkwall J,et al.Editor‘s choice-management of descending thoracic aorta diseases:clinical practice guidelines of the European society for vascular surgery(ESVS)[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg,2017,53(1):4-52.
[14] 中华医学会外科学会血管外科学组. Stanford B型主动脉夹层诊断和治疗中国专家共识(2022版)[J]. 中国血管外科杂志(电子版),2022,14(2):119-130.
Vascular Surgery Group of Surgery Committee of Chinese Medical Association. Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of Stanford type B aortic dissection(2022 edition)[J]. Chin J Vasc Surg Electron Version,2022,14(2):119-130.
[15] 中华医学会心血管病学分会大血管学组,中国医师协会心血管内科医师分会指南与共识工作委员会. 胸主动脉腔内治疗围手术期管理中国专家共识[J]. 中华医学杂志,2019,99(32):2489-2496.
Macrovascular Group of Cardiovascular Disease Branch of Chinese Medical Association,Guide and Consensus Working Committee of Cardiovascular Physicians Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association. China expert consensus on perioperative management of endovascular treatment of thoracic aorta[J]. Natl Med J China,2019,99(32):2489-2496.
[16] Czerny M,Schmidli J,Adler S,et al.Current options and recommendations for the treatment of thoracic aortic pathologies involving the aortic arch:an expert consensus document of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic surgery(EACTS) and the European Society for Vascular Surgery(ESVS)[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg,2019,55(1):133-162.
[17] 中国医师协会心血管外科分会大血管外科专业委员会. 主动脉夹层诊断与治疗规范中国专家共识[J]. 中华胸心血管外科杂志,2017,33(11):641-654.
The Great Vessels Committee of Cardiovascular Surgeons Branch of Chinese Physician Association. Chinese experts‘ consensus of standardized diagnosis and treatment for aortic dissection[J]. Chin J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2017,33(11):641-654.
[18] Spanos K,Nana P,Behrendt CA,et al.Management of descending thoracic aortic diseases:similarities and differences among cardiovascular guidelines[J]. J Endovasc Ther,2021,28(2):323-331.
[19] Mousavizadeh M,Daliri M,Aljadayel HA,et al.Hypothermic circulatory arrest time affects neurological outcomes of frozen elephant trunk for acute type A aortic dissection:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Card Surg,2021,36(9):3337-3351.
[20] Preventza O,Liao JL,Olive JK,et al. Neurologic complications after the frozen elephant trunk procedure:a meta-analysis of more than3000 patients[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2020,160(1):20-33.e4.
[21] Malloy PC,Raghavan A,Elder T,et al.Cerebrospinal fluid drainage during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair:a systematic review of the literature and treatment recommendations[J]. Vasc Endovascular Surg,2020,54(3):205-213.
[22] Chen XY,Wang JR,Premaratne S,et al.Meta-analysis of the outcomes of revascularization after intentional coverage of the left subclavian artery for thoracic endovascular aortic repair[J]. J Vasc Surg,2019,70(4):1330-1340.
[23] 苏奕明,魏立春,侯培勇,等. 脑脊液引流防治胸腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术后脊髓损伤疗效及安全性的系统评价和Meta分析[J]. 中国普通外科杂志,2019,28(6):687-695.
Su YM,Wei LC,Hou PY,et al.Efficacy and safety of cerebrospinal fluid drainage for prevention and treatment of spinal cord injury after thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair:a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Chin J Gen Surg,2019,28(6):687-695.
[24] Dijkstra ML,Vainas T,Zeebregts CJ,et al.Editor‘s choice-spinal cord ischaemia in endovascular thoracic and thoraco-abdominal aortic repair:review of preventive strategies[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg,2018,55(6):829-841.
[25] Huang Q,Chen XM,Yang H,et al.Effect of left subclavian artery revascularisation in thoracic endovascular aortic repair:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg,2018,56(5):644-651.
[26] Wong CS,Healy D,Canning C,et al.A systematic review of spinal cord injury and cerebrospinal fluid drainage after thoracic aortic endografting[J]. J Vasc Surg,2012,56(5):1438-1447.
[27] Hsu CC,Kwan GN,van Driel ML,et a. Distal aortic perfusion during thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair for prevention of paraplegia[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2012(3):CD008197.
[28] Cooper DG,Walsh SR,Sadat U,et al.Neurological complications after left subclavian artery coverage during thoracic endovascular aortic repair:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Vasc Surg,2009,49(6):1594-1601.
[29] Cinà CS,Abouzahr L,Arena GO,et al.Cerebrospinal fluid drainage to prevent paraplegia during thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm surgery:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Vasc Surg,2004,40(1):36-44.
[30] 邹以席,黄方炯,孙东,等. 胸腹主动脉瘤手术中脑脊液引流对脊髓的保护作用[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2012,19(2):154-158.
Zou YX,Huang FJ,Sun D,et al.Spinal cord protection effect of cerebrospinal fluid drainage for patients undergoing thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm surgery[J]. Chin J Clin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2012,19(2):154-158.
[31] Coselli JS,LeMaire SA,Köksoy C,et al. Cerebrospinal fluid drainage reduces paraplegia after thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair:results of a randomized clinical trial[J]. J Vasc Surg,2002,35(4):631-639.