Chinese Journal of Emergency and Critical Care Nursing >
Construction and application of an evaluation index system of treatment timeliness quality for emergency severe trauma patients
Received date: 2024-09-13
Online published: 2025-09-02
Objective To develop an evaluation index system of treatment timeliness quality for emergency severe trauma patients and to evaluate its effectiveness. Methods Based on three-dimensional quality structure model,the literature search,group discussion,Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process were used to determine the contents and weight of evaluation index system. Patients with severe trauma admitted to the emergency rescue room of a tertiary grade A hospital in Nantong City from March to May 2024 were selected as the control group,patients from June to August were in the experimental group. Both groups of patients followed the established rescue process for severe trauma patients in our hospital for nursing care. The quality control in the experimental group was implemented by the quality control standards and checklists based on the constructed evaluation indicators for emergency treatment of severe trauma patients. The implementation status of indicators by nurses were compared between the two groups. Results The evaluation index system included 3 first-level indexes,13 second-level indexes and 40 third-level indexes. Effective recovery rates of two rounds of expert consultation were 86.67% and 100%,expert authority coefficients were 0.800 and 0.840 respectively,coefficients of concordance were 0.284 and 0.321,the coefficients of variation for each item in the 2nd round of correspondence were 0.01~0.21. After the implementation of evaluation indicators,significant improvements were observed in compliance rates for blood type and CBC sample delivery within 10 minutes,blood transfusion completion within 30 minutes,and CT scan completion within 30 minutes,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05). Additionally,nurses demonstrated marked improvement in completing initial pain assessments and body temperature monitoring(P<0.05). However,most indicators did not demonstrate a sustained significant improvement trend in subsequent dynamic evaluations. Conclusion The constructed evaluation indicators of treatment timeliness quality for emergency severe trauma patients is scientific,reliable and comprehensive,which can provide reference for implementing standardized and detailed nursing care for acute severe trauma patients.
WANG Lingli , LIU Xiaoqin , CHEN Tianxi , ZHAO Xudong , MAO Saxian , XUE Shixia , JIANG Hui . Construction and application of an evaluation index system of treatment timeliness quality for emergency severe trauma patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Emergency and Critical Care Nursing, 2025 , 6(9) : 1061 -1066 . DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.2096-7446.2025.09.006
| [1] | World Health Organization. Global health estimates 2020:Deaths by cause,age,sex,by country and by region,2000[R]. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2020. |
| [2] | 张鹏, 杜哲, 刘中砥, 等. 我国医生对严重创伤评估能力的多中心调查[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2021, 30(5):533-536. |
| Zhang P, Du Z, Liu ZD, et al. A multicenter survey of doctors’ ability to assess severe trauma in China[J]. Chin J Emerg Med, 2021, 30(5):533-536. | |
| [3] | 张华君, 张旋, 张其红, 等. 实时视频录像反馈学习法在提高严重多发伤病人救护时效性方面的探讨[J]. 护理研究, 2016, 30(25):3164-3166. |
| Zhang HJ, Zhang X, Zhang QH, et al. Probe into real-time video feedback learning method in improving the timeliness of emergency treatment of patients with severe multiple injuries[J]. Chin Nurs Res, 2016, 30(25):3164-3166. | |
| [4] | 杨杰, 刘畅, 连鸿凯. “黄金1小时”理念在严重创伤救治中的应用及发展[J]. 创伤外科杂志, 2022, 24(10):795-799,801. |
| Yang J, Liu C, Lian HK. “Golden Hour” in the treatment of severe trauma:application and development[J]. J Trauma Surg, 2022, 24(10):795-799,801. | |
| [5] | 陈慧娟, 刘洋, 孙丽冰. 创伤救治护理质量控制指标的研究现状及启示[J]. 中华急危重症护理杂志, 2021, 2(4):335-338. |
| Chen HJ, Liu Y, Sun LB. Research status quo and enlightenment on the nursing quality control indicators of trauma care[J]. Chin J Emerg Crit Care Nurs, 2021, 2(4):335-338. | |
| [6] | 中国创伤救治联盟.中国创伤救治联盟创伤中心现场评估指标细则[Z]. 2022-09-02. |
| China Trauma Rescue Treatment Association.Detailed rules for site evaluation index of trauma center of China Trauma Rescue Treatment Association[Z]. 2022-09-02. | |
| [7] | 彭蕾, 陈雪妹, 刘建, 等. 严重创伤急救护理质量评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(23):20-24. |
| Peng L, Chen XM, Liu J, et al. Construction of quality evaluation index system of emergency nursing for severe trauma[J]. J Nurs China, 2021, 28(23):20-24. | |
| [8] | 王雪, 樊落, 柳少光, 等. 甘肃省创伤救治护理管理体系的构建研究[J]. 中华急危重症护理杂志, 2022, 3(2):107-115. |
| Wang X, Fan L, Liu SG, et al. Construction of trauma treatment and nursing management system in Gansu province[J]. Chin J Emerg Crit Care Nurs, 2022, 3(2):107-115. | |
| [9] | Coccolini F, Kluger Y, Moore EE, et al. Trauma quality indicators:internationally approved core factors for trauma management quality evaluation[J]. World J Emerg Surg, 2021, 16(1):6. |
| [10] | Moore L, Lavoie A, Bourgeois G, et al. Donabedian’s structure-process-outcome quality of care model:Validation in an integrated trauma system[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2015, 78(6):1168-1175. |
| [11] | 国家卫生健康委办公厅. 国家卫生健康委办公厅关于印发急诊医学等6个专业医疗质量控制指标(2024年版)的通知[EB/OL]. (2024-05-16)[2024-07-27]. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/yzygj/s7657/202405/97077a8e0c7a4db68e8e6ad64a3880f0.shtml. |
| General Office of the National Health Commission. National Health Commission Office’s notice on issuing 6 special medical quality control indicators for emergency medicine(2024 Edition)[EB/OL]. (2024-05-16)[2024-07-27]. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/yzygj/s7657/202405/97077a8e0c7a4db68e8e6ad64a3880f0.shtml. | |
| [12] | 陈翔宇, 刘明华, 赵晓东. 《创伤失血性休克中国急诊专家共识(2023)》解读[J]. 中国急救医学, 2023, 43(12):933-936. |
| Chen XY, Liu MH, Zhao XD. Interpretation of China emergency expert consensus on traumatic hemorrhagic shock(2023)[J]. Chin J Crit Care Med, 2023, 43(12):933-936. | |
| [13] | 王宏秋, 赵丽新, 王亚妹, 等. 急诊移动护理信息系统的设计及应用[J]. 中国数字医学, 2022, 17(8):48-51. |
| Wang HQ, Zhao LX, Wang YM, et al. Design and application of emergency mobile nursing information system[J]. China Digit Med, 2022, 17(8):48-51. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |