收稿日期: 2024-11-14
网络出版日期: 2025-11-04
基金资助
浙大一院护理学科建设科研项目(2023ZYHL22);浙江省基础公益研究计划(LTGY23H030004);浙江大学“双一流”建设护理优势特色学科科研培育基金项目(HL2024020)
Analysis of the current status and influencing factors of quality of life in pediatric liver transplant recipients
目的 调查儿童肝移植受者术后生活质量的现状,并分析其影响因素。 方法 通过连续抽样法选取2023年8月—2024年9月在浙江省某三级甲等医院门诊进行随访的273例儿童肝移植受者,采用一般资料调查表、儿童生活质量量表(Pediatric Quality of Life InventoryTM,PedsQLTM)3.0移植模块进行生活质量调查。采用Pearson相关分析法分析儿童肝移植受者生活质量影响因素。结果 共发放问卷281份,回收合格问卷273份。273例儿童肝移植受者中,2~4岁生活质量总分为72.28(61.41,86.41)分,5~7岁受者生活质量总分为68.48(58.15,75.00)分,8~18岁受者生活质量总分为71.96(60.98,94.57)分。单因素分析结果显示,城镇户口受者生活质量总分高于农村户口受者(P<0.05),家庭月收入高的受者生活质量高于家庭月收入低的受者(P<0.05)。不同年龄组问卷“药物不良反应”“担忧”“对外貌的自我感觉”3个维度差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。相关分析结果显示,移植术后时间与“药物依从性”和“移植后社会关系”2个维度均呈正相关(r=0.214,P<0.001;r=0.167,P=0.006),受者身高与“药物不良反应”和“焦虑治疗”2个维度均呈正相关(r=0.242,P<0.001;r=0.145,P=0.016),受者体重与“药物不良反应”和“焦虑治疗”2个维度均呈正相关(r=0.183,P=0.002;r=0.151,P=0.013)。Z评分法评价结果显示,48例受者存在生长发育障碍,其中2~4岁46例,5~7岁和8~18岁各1例。结论 儿童肝移植受者术后生活质量有待提高;不同户口类型和家庭月收入是儿童肝移植受者生活质量的影响因素;移植术后时间、身高、体重与其均有一定关系。
王燕 , 卢芳燕 , 徐汝 , 吴静韵 , 汤洒潇 , 吉莉 . 儿童肝移植受者生活质量现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中华急危重症护理杂志, 2025 , 6(11) : 1349 -1354 . DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.2096-7446.2025.11.011
Objective To investigate the current status of postoperative quality of life of pediatric liver transplant recipients and to analyze its related factors. Methods A total of 273 pediatric liver transplant recipients who were followed up in the outpatient clinic of a tertiary class A hospital in Zhejiang Province from August 2023 to September 2024 were selected by continuous sampling method,and the quality of life survey was conducted using the general information questionnaire and the Pediatric Quality of Life InventoryTM(PedsQLTM) 3.0 transplant module. Pearson correlation analysis was used to analyze the factors affecting the quality of life of pediatric liver transplant recipients. Results A total of 281 questionnaires were distributed,and 273 qualified questionnaires were recovered. Among 273 pediatric liver transplant recipients,the total quality of life score was 72.28(61.41,86.41) for recipients aged 2~4 years,68.48(58.15,75.00) for recipients aged 5~7 years, and 71.96(60.98,94.57) for recipients aged 8~18 years. The results of univariate analysis showed that the total quality of life score of urban recipients was higher than that of rural recipients(P<0.05),and the quality of life of recipients with high monthly household income was higher than that of recipients with low monthly household income(P<0.05). There were statistically significant differences in the three dimensions of “adverse drug reactions”“worry” and “self-perception of appearance” of questionnaires among different age groups(P<0.05). The results of correlation analysis showed that there was positively correlation between post-transplant time and two dimensions of “drug compliance” and “post-transplant social relationship”(r=0.214,P<0.001;r=0.167,P=0.006),and the height of the recipient was positively correlated with the two dimensions of “adverse drug reaction” and “anxiety treatment”(r=0.242,P<0.001;r=0.145,P=0.016),and the weight of the recipient was positively correlated with the two dimensions of “adverse drug reaction” and “anxiety treatment”(r=0.183,P=0.002;r=0.151,P=0.013). The results of Z-score method showed that 48 recipients had growth and development disorders,including 46 cases at the age of 2~4 years old,and 1 case at the age of 5~7 years and 1 case at the age of 8~18 years. Conclusion The quality of life of pediatric liver transplant recipients needs to be improved. Different resident types and monthly household income were the influencing factors for the quality of life of pediatric liver transplant recipients. The time after transplantation,height and weight are all related to the quality of life.
Key words: Liver Transplantation; Children; Quality of Life; Questionnaires
| [1] | 中国研究型医院学会加速康复外科专业委员会. 儿童肝移植围手术期管理专家共识[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2021, 59(3):179-191. |
| Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Committee of Chinese Re-search Hospital Association. Expert consensus of perioperative management in pediatric liver transplantation[J]. Chin J Surg, 2021, 59(3):179-191. | |
| [2] | 罗毅. 中国儿童肝移植操作规范(2019版)[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2019,13(3):181-186. |
| Luo Y. Technical specification for pediatric liver transplanta-tion in China(2019 edition)[J/OL]. Chin J Transplant Electron Ed, 2019, 13(3):181-186. | |
| [3] | 王燕, 卢芳燕, 王芳. 丙酸血症患儿行亲体肝移植的术后护理[J]. 中华急危重症护理杂志, 2023, 4(4):347-349. |
| Wang Y, Lu FY, Wang F. Postoperative nursing of children with propionic acidemia undergoing parent-child liver trans-plantation[J]. Chin J Emerg Crit Care Nurs, 2023, 4(4):347-349. | |
| [4] | 唐艳, 刘洋, 王紫娟, 等. 个体化干预模式在儿童肝移植受者术后随访中的应用[J]. 临床小儿外科杂志, 2016, 15(1):41-45. |
| Tang Y, Liu Y, Wang ZJ, et al. Applicatin individual intervene model in the following-up of recipient after liver transplan-tation[J]. J Clin Pediatr Surg, 2016, 15(1):41-45. | |
| [5] | 杨旸, 辛文琼, 向波, 等. 儿童活体肝移植受体术后的生活质量及其影响因素[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2018, 25(8):912-916. |
| Yang Y, Xin WQ, Xiang B, et al. Quality of life of pediatric living donor liver transplantation recipient and it's influencing factors[J]. Chin J Bases Clin Gen Surg, 2018, 25(8):912-916. | |
| [6] | 高峰, 陆晔峰. 儿童肝移植术后一年生命质量及其影响因素研究[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2019, 35(16):1256-1260. |
| Gao F, Lu YF. Survey of quality of life among the pediatric patients who have received the liver transplantation for one year[J]. Chin J Pract Nurs, 2019, 35(16):1256-1260. | |
| [7] | 陆晔峰, 王艳, 万平, 等. 肝移植患儿术后5年生活质量的调查[J]. 中国临床新医学, 2019, 12(10):1057-1060. |
| Lu YF, Wang Y, Wan P, et al. The investigation of quality of life among the pediatric patients with liver transplantation for 5 years[J]. Chin J New Clin Med, 2019, 12(10):1057-1060. | |
| [8] | Hager A, Mager D, Robert C, et al. Health-related quality of life 10 years after liver transplantation:a longitudinal retrospe-ctive review[J]. Diagnostics, 2021, 11(1):111. |
| [9] | Weissberg-Benchell J, Zielinski TE, Rodgers S, et al. Pediatric health-related quality of life:feasibility,reliability and validity of the PedsQL transplant module[J]. Am J Transplant, 2010, 10 (7):1677-1685. |
| [10] | He K, Shen CH, Chen XS, et al. Health-related quality of life and sleep among Chinese children after living donor liver transplantation[J]. Pediatr Transplant, 2015, 19(5):547-554. |
| [11] | 常颖, 高吉照, 王文鹏. 良性与恶性血液病经造血干细胞移植后患儿生存质量的对比及其影响因素分析[J]. 中国小儿血液与肿瘤杂志, 2023, 28(4):248-252. |
| Chang Y, Gao JZ, Wang WP. Comparison of quality of life and analysis of influencing factors in children with benign and malignant diseases after hematopoietic stem cell trans-plantation[J]. J China Pediatr Blood Cancer, 2023, 28(4):248-252. | |
| [12] | 鞠瑞秀, 王慎田. 儿童生长发育对药物作用的影响及意义[J]. 中国临床药理学与治疗学, 2004,(8):859-862. |
| Ju RX, Wang ST. The effect and significance of children's growth and development on the effect of drugs[J]. Chin J Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2004,(8):859-862. | |
| [13] | 宋玉伟, 朱志军, 孙丽莹, 等. 儿童肝移植术后生长发育的临床研究[J]. 器官移植, 2015, 6(4):235-239. |
| Song YW, Zhu ZJ, Sun LY, et al. Clinical study on growth and development of children after liver transplantation[J]. Organ Transplant, 2015, 6(4):235-239. | |
| [14] | 朱凤梅. 户籍类型与城乡居民医疗服务利用:基于Andersen模型的经验分析[J]. 南方人口, 2020, 35(4):1-16. |
| Zhu FM. The household registration type and the health-care utilization of urban and rural residents:empirical analysis based on Anderson model[J]. South China Popul, 2020, 35(4):1-16. | |
| [15] | 王璐, 卢芳燕, 吕斐翠, 等. 肝移植受者自我管理行为研究进展[J]. 护理研究, 2024, 38(16):2895-2899. |
| Wang L, Lu FY, Lü FC, et al. Research progress on self-ma-nagement behavior of liver transplant recipients[J]. Chin Nurs Res, 2024, 38(16):2895-2899. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |