ISSN 2097-6046(网络)
ISSN 2096-7446(印刷)
CN 10-1655/R
主管:中国科学技术协会
主办:中华护理学会

中华急危重症护理杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (10): 944-949.doi: 10.3761/j.issn.2096-7446.2024.10.015

• 证据综合研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

ICU意识模糊评估量表与重症监护谵妄筛查量表应用效果比较的Meta分析

谢铃莉, 孙建华, 赵明曦, 罗红波, 李尊柱   

  1. 100070 北京市 中国医学科学院北京协和医院内科ICU(谢铃莉,孙建华),重症医学科(赵明曦,罗红波,李尊柱)
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-13 发布日期:2024-10-21
  • 通讯作者: 罗红波,E-mail:luohongbo33@126.com
  • 作者简介:谢铃莉:女,硕士,主管护师,E-mail:xielingli0322@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    北京协和医院护理科研项目(XHHLKY202122)

Comparing CAM-ICU and ICDSC for the screening of delirium in critically ill patients:a meta-analysis

XIE Lingli, SUN Jianhua, ZHAO Mingxi, LUO Hongbo, LI Zunzhu   

  • Received:2023-11-13 Published:2024-10-21

摘要: 目的 评价ICU意识模糊评估量表(Confusion Assessment Method of Intensive Care Unit,CAM-ICU)和重症监护谵妄筛查量表(Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist,ICDSC)对重症患者谵妄发生的应用效果,为重症患者谵妄筛查的工具选择提供依据。方法 计算机检索PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Cochrane Library、中国知网、万方数据库、维普数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库从建库至2023年2月24日关于CAM-ICU与ICDSC的诊断试验准确性比较研究。经过文献筛选、文献质量评估、资料提取后,采用Rev Man 5.3软件和Meta-DiSc软件进行数据分析。结果 共纳入10篇研究,CAM-ICU和ICDSC的合并灵敏度分别为0.73和0.77;合并特异度分别为0.93和0.91;合并诊断比值比为37.62和36.95。结论 CAM-ICU与ICDSC在重症患者谵妄筛查中均具有良好的诊断效度;基于谵妄的波动性特点,CAM-ICU可能更适合ICU环境下患者的谵妄评估。

关键词: 谵妄, 重症监护, 灵敏度, 特异度, 诊断性试验准确性比较研究, Meta分析

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the screening efficacy of Confusion Assessment Methodof Intensive Care Unit(CAM-ICU) and Intensive Care Delirium Screening Scale(ICDSC) for the occurrence of delirium in critically ill patients,and to provide evidence for the selection of tools for the screening of delirium in critically ill patients. Methods Comparative studies on accuracy of diagnostic tests between CAM-ICU and ICDSC were searched by computer in Pubmed,Web of Science,Embase,The Cochrane Library,CNKI,Wanfang Database,VIP database and Chinese Biomedical Literature database,respectively from the establishment of the database to February 24,2023. After literature screening,literature quality assessment and data extraction,Rev Man 5.3 and meta-DiSc software were used for data analysis. Results A total of 10 studies were included. The combined sensitivity of CAM-ICU and ICDSC were 0.73 and 0.77,respectively. The combined specificity was 0.93 and 0.91. The odds ratios of combined diagnosis were 37.62 and 36.95. Conclusion Both CAM-ICU and ICDSC have good diagnostic validity in screening patients with moderate and severe delirium. However,based on the fluctuation characteristics of delirium,CAM-ICU may be more suitable for delirium assessment in patients in the ICU environment.

Key words: Delirium, Intensive Care, Sensitivity, Specificity, Comparative Diagnosis Test Accuracy Studies, Meta Analysis