ISSN 2097-6046(网络)
ISSN 2096-7446(印刷)
CN 10-1655/R
主管:中国科学技术协会
主办:中华护理学会

中华急危重症护理杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (12): 1510-1516.doi: 10.3761/j.issn.2096-7446.2025.12.018

• 证据综合研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

ICU患者亚谵妄综合征风险预测模型的系统评价

侯冲(), 张沛哲, 郭锦丽(), 张楠   

  1. 030000 太原市 山西医科大学护理学院(侯冲,张沛哲),山西医科大学第二医院教学部(郭锦丽);山东中医药大学护理学院(张楠)
  • 收稿日期:2025-01-06 出版日期:2025-12-10 发布日期:2025-12-11
  • 通讯作者: 郭锦丽 E-mail:iamsureiv@163.com;gjlgbd@126.com
  • 作者简介:侯冲:女,本科(硕士在读),护士,E-mail:iamsureiv@163.com

A systematic review of a risk prediction models for subdelirium syndrome in ICU-hospitalized patients

HOU Chong(), ZHANG Peizhe, GUO Jinli(), ZHANG Nan   

  • Received:2025-01-06 Online:2025-12-10 Published:2025-12-11
  • Contact: GUO Jinli E-mail:iamsureiv@163.com;gjlgbd@126.com

摘要:

目的 系统检索和评价ICU住院患者发生亚谵妄综合征的风险预测模型,以期为临床实践及相关研究提供参考。 方法 系统检索PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、Embase、CINAHL、万方数据库、中国知网、维普数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库中相关研究,检索时限为建库至2024年10月12日。2名研究者分别进行文献筛选、信息提取并进行文献的方法学质量评估。 结果 共纳入8项研究,涉及10个模型,样本量为306~700例,结局事件发生率为8.97%~35.14%。模型报告的受试者操作特征曲线下面积均>0.7;6个模型报告了校准度;3项研究内外部验证相结合;8项研究总体适用性较好,但均存在较高的偏倚风险。 结论 ICU住院患者亚谵妄综合征风险预测模型的研究尚处于起步阶段,未来的研究应完善研究设计和报告流程,并制订统一的亚谵妄综合征评估工具,进一步评估模型在临床实践中的效果和可行性。

关键词: 重症监护室, 亚谵妄综合征, 预测模型, 系统评价, 循证护理学

Abstract:

Objective To systematically search and evaluate the risk prediction models of subdelirium syndrome in hospitalized ICU patients,in order to provide reference for clinical practice and related research. Methods Relevant studies in PubMed,Web of Science,Cochrane Library,Embase,CINAHL,Wanfang Database,CNKI,VIP and CBM were searched systematically until October 12,2024. Two researchers conducted literature screening,information extraction and methodological quality assessment of the literature respectively. Results A total of 8 studies were included,involving 10 models. The sample size ranged from 306 to 700 cases,and the incidence of outcome events ranged from 8.97 to 35.14%. The area under receiver operating curve reported by the model was all >0.7. Calibration degree was reported for 6 models. Three studies performed both internal and external validation. The overall applicability of the eight studies was good,but there was a high risk of bias. Conclusion The study of risk prediction model for ICU patients with subdelirium syndrome is still in its infancy. Future studies should improve the study design and reporting process,and develop a unified subdelirium syndrome evaluation tool to further evaluate the effect and feasibility of the model in clinical practice.

Key words: ICU, Subdelirium Syndrome, Prediction Model, Systematic Evaluation, Evidence-Based Nursing