ISSN 2097-6046(网络)
ISSN 2096-7446(印刷)
CN 10-1655/R
主管:中国科学技术协会
主办:中华护理学会

中华急危重症护理杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (8): 1017-1024.doi: 10.3761/j.issn.2096-7446.2026.08.021

• 综述 • 上一篇    

持续葡萄糖监测在新生儿及儿科重症监护病房中应用准确性的范围综述

汪依佳1(), 潘爱红2,*(), 王铖琛2, 张哲2, 李雅兰1, 张梦霞1, 郭秀侠1   

  1. 1 安徽医科大学护理学院 合肥市 230000
    2 合肥市第一人民医院护理部 合肥市 230000
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-03 出版日期:2026-08-10 发布日期:2026-08-04
  • 通讯作者: *潘爱红,E-mail:281851862@qq.com
  • 作者简介:汪依佳:女,本科(硕士在读),护士,E-mail:18258259600@163.com
    作者贡献声明

    汪依佳:选题设计、文献整理分析、论文撰写修改;潘爱红:选题设计、论文审阅、基金支持;王铖琛、张哲、李雅兰、张梦霞、郭秀侠:文献整理分析

Accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units:a scoping review

WANG Yijia1(), PAN Aihong2,*(), WANG Chengchen2, ZHANG Zhe2, LI Yalan1, ZHANG Mengxia1, GUO Xiuxia1   

  1. 1 School of NursingAnhui Medical UniversityHefei 230000, China
    2 Department of Nursingthe First People’s Hospital of HefeiHefei 230000, China
  • Received:2025-09-03 Online:2026-08-10 Published:2026-08-04
  • Contact: *PAN Aihong,E-mail:281851862@qq.com

摘要:

目的 了解持续葡萄糖监测在新生儿及儿科重症监护病房中应用的准确性现状。 方法 基于范围综述框架,系统检索Cochrane Library、Embase、PubMed、Web of Science、中国知网、万方数据库、维普数据库,检索时限为建库至2025年4月8日。 结果 最终纳入23篇文献,准确性评估指标主要包括平均绝对相对误差、误差网格分析、Bland-Altman分析和Pearson相关系数等。持续葡萄糖监测在新生儿及儿科重症患儿中的准确性存在较大差异,平均绝对相对误差范围为7.1%~28.3%,误差网格分析可接受区范围为89.0%~100%,Bland-Altman分析偏倚范围为-0.38~1.76 mmol/L。 结论 持续葡萄糖监测在新生儿及儿科重症监护病房中的应用尚处于初步阶段,临床应用需谨慎。未来需进一步构建持续葡萄糖监测规范化使用策略,以及建立针对危重患儿的专用评估标准体系。

关键词: 持续葡萄糖监测, 新生儿重症监护病房, 儿科重症监护病房, 血糖管理, 准确性评价, 范围综述

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the current status of accuracy regarding the application of continuous glu-cose monitoring(CGM) in neonatal intensive care units(NICUs) and pediatric intensive care units(PICUs). Methods Following the scoping review framework,a systematic search was conducted in the Cochrane Library,Embase,PubMed,Web of Science,CNKI,Wanfang,and VIP databases from their inception to April 8,2025. Results A total of 23 articles were included. The primary accuracy assessment indicators included the mean absolute relative difference(MARD),error grid analysis(EGA),Bland-Altman analysis,and Pearson correlation coefficient. The accuracy of CGM in critically ill neonates and pediatric patients varied widely. MARE ranged from 7.1% to 28.3%,the clinically acceptable zone in EGA ranged from 89.0% to 100%,and the bias in Bland-Altman analysis ranged from -0.38 to 1.76 mmol/L. Conclusion The application of CGM in PICU/NICU remains in its preliminary stages,and clinical implementation requires caution. Future efforts should focus on establishing standardized protocols for CGM use and developing specialized accuracy assessment criteria for critically ill pediatric patients.

Key words: Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Glycemic Management, Accuracy Assessment, Scoping Review