ISSN 2097-6046(网络)
ISSN 2096-7446(印刷)
CN 10-1655/R
主管:中国科学技术协会
主办:中华护理学会
综述

决策辅助工具在ICU患者生命支持治疗中应用的范围综述

  • 周红芳 ,
  • 岳伟岗 ,
  • 吴雨晨 ,
  • 何成英 ,
  • 兰旭红 ,
  • 王恒阳 ,
  • 贾东珲 ,
  • 王倩 ,
  • 张志刚
展开
  • 730011 兰州市 兰州大学第一医院重症医学科(周红芳,岳伟岗,何成英,张志刚),麻醉手术科(吴雨晨);兰州大学护理学院(兰旭红,王恒阳,贾东珲,王倩)
周红芳:女,硕士,主管护师,E-mail:ldyyzhouhf@163.com
张志刚,E-mail:zzg3444@163.com

收稿日期: 2024-09-18

  网络出版日期: 2025-07-04

基金资助

甘肃省科技计划项目(24JRRA309);甘肃省卫生健康行业科研计划项目(GSWSHL2023-09)

The application of decision aids for patients with life-support treatment in ICU:a scoping review

  • ZHOU Hongfang ,
  • YUE Weigang ,
  • WU Yuchen ,
  • HE Chengying ,
  • LAN Xuhong ,
  • WANG Hengyang ,
  • JIA Donghui ,
  • WANG Qian ,
  • ZHANG Zhigang
Expand

Received date: 2024-09-18

  Online published: 2025-07-04

摘要

目的 对ICU生命支持治疗中的决策辅助工具(decision aid, DA)进行范围综述,明确ICU中DA的应用现状、内容要素及应用效果,为国内ICU患者关于生命支持治疗DA的开发提供指导。 方法 检索PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Cochrane Library、中国知网、万方数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库、维普数据库。检索时限为建库至2024年5月7日。对纳入文献进行汇总和分析。 结果 共纳入21篇文献,DA涵盖的主题包括特定疾病、维持生命的治疗、预先护理计划、临终关怀。DA的内容要素包括明确治疗选择、信息支持、与治疗选项有关的风险利弊说明、澄清价值观、引导决策制订。评价指标包括决策过程质量、决策质量、DA对患方及医疗机构的影响、可行性、可用性、可接受性。 结论 DA在ICU生命支持治疗中表现出了良好的效果,ICU中的DA主要集中在特定的疾病和生命支持治疗及护理目标上,而ICU大多数患者多病共存,生命支持治疗措施也不止一项,应充分考虑国内现状,开发适用于中国ICU患者生命支持治疗的DA,以满足不同群体的个性化需求。

本文引用格式

周红芳 , 岳伟岗 , 吴雨晨 , 何成英 , 兰旭红 , 王恒阳 , 贾东珲 , 王倩 , 张志刚 . 决策辅助工具在ICU患者生命支持治疗中应用的范围综述[J]. 中华急危重症护理杂志, 2025 , 6(7) : 885 -890 . DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.2096-7446.2025.07.021

Abstract

Objective To conduct a scoping review of decision aids(DA) for patients with life-support treatment in ICU,identify the application status of DA in ICU,content elements and application effects,provide guidance for the development of DA for life support therapy in ICU patients in China. Methods PubMed,Web of Science,Embase,Cochrane Library,CNKI,Wanfang database,CBM and VIP database were searched. The retrieval time limit was from the establishment of databases until May 7,2024. The included literature was summarized and analyzed. Results A total of 21 articles were included,and topics on DA included specific diseases,life-sustaining treatments,advance care planning,hospice care. The content elements of DA included clear treatment options,information support,risks and benefits associated with treatment options,clarifying values and guiding decision-making. The evaluation indexes included the quality of the decision making process,decision quality,the impact of DA on patients and medical institutions,feasibility,usability and acceptability. Conclusion DA has shown good effects in ICU life support treatment. DA mainly focuses on specific diseases,life support treatment and nursing goals in ICU,while most patients coexist with multiple diseases,the life support treatment measures are not limited to one. We should fully consider the domestic situation and develop DA suitable for ICU patients with life-support treatment in China to meet the individual needs of different groups.

参考文献

[1] Cai XM, Robinson J, Muehlschlegel S, et al. Patient preferences and surrogate decision making in neuroscience intensive care units[J]. Neurocrit Care, 2015, 23(1):131-141.
[2] Wilson ME, Dobler CC, Zubek L, et al. Prevalence of disagree-ment about appropriateness of treatment between ICU patients/surrogates and clinicians[J]. Chest, 2019, 155(6):1140-1147.
[3] 林琪, 董芳辉, 曾莉, 等. 神经重症患者家属创伤后成长的影响因素及路径分析[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(6):836-842.
  Lin Q, Dong FH, Zeng L, et al. Analysis of influencing factors and pathway of post-traumatic growth in family members of neurosurgical intensive care unit patients[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2021, 56(6):836-842.
[4] 乔晓婷, 隋伟静, 王凯丽, 等. ICU患者家属决策冲突现状及影响因素研究[J]. 中华急危重症护理杂志, 2024, 5(8):677-682.
  Qiao XT, Sui WJ, Wang KL, et al. Research on the status quo and influencing factors of decision conflict among family members of ICU patients[J]. Chin J Emerg Crit Care Nurs, 2024, 5(8):677-682.
[5] Stacey D, Lewis KB, Smith M, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions[J]. Cochrane Da-tabase Syst Rev, 2024, 1(1):CD001431.
[6] Lockwood C, Dos Santos KB, Pap R. Practical guidance for know-ledge synthesis:scoping review methods[J]. Asian Nurs Res, 2019, 13(5):287-294.
[7] Légaré F, Hébert J, Goh L, et al. Do choosing wisely tools meet criteria for patient decision aids? A descriptive analysis of patient materials[J]. BMJ Open, 2016, 6(8):e011918.
[8] Zheng M, Zhang YH, Cao Y, et al. Development of a decision aid for family surrogate decision makers of critically ill patients requiring renal replacement therapy in ICU:a user-centered design for rapid prototyping[J]. Chin Med Sci J, 2024, 39(2):91-101.
[9] Yamamoto K. Impact of advance care planning support on pa-tients treated in the intensive care unit after high-risk surgery[J]. Cureus, 2024, 16(2):e54175.
[10] Yamamoto K, Kaido T, Yokoi T, et al. Implementation of adva-nce care planning decision aids for patients undergoing high-risk surgery:a field-testing study[J]. BMC Palliat Care, 2022, 21(1):179.
[11] Muehlschlegel S, Goostrey K, Flahive J, et al. Pilot randomized clinical trial of a goals-of-care decision aid for surrogates of patients with severe acute brain injury[J]. Neurology, 2022, 99(14):e1446-e1455.
[12] Goostrey KJ, Lee C, Jones K, et al. Adapting a traumatic brain injury goals-of-care decision aid for critically ill patients to intracerebral hemorrhage and hemispheric acute ischemic stroke[J]. Crit Care Explor, 2021, 3(3):e0357.
[13] Suen AO, Butler RA, Arnold RM, et al. A pilot randomized trial of an interactive web-based tool to support surrogate decision makers in the intensive care unit[J]. Ann Am Thorac Soc, 2021, 18(7):1191-1201.
[14] Zheng M, Yin CL, Cao Y, et al. Development and evaluation of a decision aid for family surrogate decision-makers for patients with acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy(RRT) in ICUs:a study protocol[J]. BMJ Open, 2021, 11(2):e043385.
[15] Tate CE, Venechuk G, Pierce K, et al. Development of a deci-sion aid for patients and families considering hospice[J]. J Pal-liat Med, 2021, 24(4):505-513.
[16] Muehlschlegel S, Hwang DY, Flahive J, et al. Goals-of-care deci-sion aid for critically ill patients with TBI:development and feasibility testing[J]. Neurology, 2020, 95(2):e179-e193.
[17] Suen AO, Butler RA, Arnold R, et al. Developing the family support tool:an interactive,web-based tool to help families navigate the complexities of surrogate decision making in ICUs[J]. J Crit Care, 2020,56:132-139.
[18] Cox CE, White DB, Hough CL, et al. Effects of a personalized web-based decision aid for surrogate decision makers of patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation:a randomized clinical trial[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2019, 170(5):285-297.
[19] Basile M, Andrews J, Jacome S, et al. A decision aid to sup-port shared decision making about mechanical ventilation in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients (Informed Together):feasibility study[J]. J Particip Med, 2018, 10(2):e7.
[20] Plaisance A, Witteman HO, LeBlanc A, et al. Development of a decision aid for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and invasive mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit employing user-centered design and a wiki platform for rapid proto-typing[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(2):e0191844.
[21] Green MJ, van Scoy LJ, Foy AJ, et al. A randomized control-led trial of strategies to improve family members’ prepared-ness for surrogate decision-making[J]. Am J Hosp Palliat Care, 2018, 35(6):866-874.
[22] Kapell Brown C, Kryworuchko J, Martin W. Evaluation of the CPR video decision aid with patients with end stage renal disease[J]. BMC Nephrol, 2018, 19(1):226.
[23] El-Jawahri A, Paasche-Orlow MK, Matlock D, et al. Randomi-zed,controlled trial of an advance care planning video decision support tool for patients with advanced heart failure[J]. Circulation, 2016, 134(1):52-60.
[24] Volandes AE, Paasche-Orlow MK, Davis AD, et al. Use of video decision aids to promote advance care planning in Hilo,hawai’i[J]. J Gen Intern Med, 2016, 31(9):1035-1040.
[25] Cox CE, Wysham NG, Walton B, et al. Development and usabi-lity testing of a Web-based decision aid for families of patients receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation[J]. Ann Inten-sive Care, 2015, 5:6.
[26] El-Jawahri A, Mitchell SL, Paasche-Orlow MK, et al. A rando-mized controlled trial of a CPR and intubation video deci-sion support tool for hospitalized patients[J]. J Gen Intern Med, 2015, 30(8):1071-1080.
[27] Cox CE, Lewis CL, Hanson LC, et al. Development and pilot testing of a decision aid for surrogates of patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation[J]. Crit Care Med, 2012, 40(8):2327-2334.
[28] McCannon JB, O’Donnell WJ, Thompson BT, et al. Augmenting communication and decision making in the intensive care unit with a cardiopulmonary resuscitation video decision support tool:a temporal intervention study[J]. J Palliat Med, 2012, 15(12):1382-1387.
[29] Kon AA, Davidson JE, Morrison W, et al. Shared decision mak-ing in ICUs:an American college of critical care medicine and American thoracic society policy statement[J]. Crit Care Med, 2016, 44(1):188-201.
[30] Power TE, Swartzman LC, Robinson JW. Cognitive-emotional decision making(CEDM):a framework of patient medical de-cision making[J]. Patient Educ Couns, 2011, 83(2):163-169.
文章导航

/