收稿日期: 2024-08-06
网络出版日期: 2025-06-06
Best evidence summary for prevention and management of spinal cord ischemia after thoracic endovascular aortic repair
目的 评价并总结胸主动脉腔内修复（thoracic endovascular aortic repair，TEVAR）患者围手术期脊髓缺血评估及管理的最佳证据。 方法 系统检索国内外数据库、相关专业网站中关于TEVAR患者围手术期脊髓缺血评估及管理的临床决策、指南、专家共识、系统评价、证据总结、原始研究等，检索时限为2014年1月1日至2024年5月23日。由2名研究者对纳入文献进行质量评价、资料提取、证据分级及汇总。 结果 共纳入15篇文献，包括临床决策1篇、指南5篇、专家共识6篇、系统评价2篇、队列研究1篇。从多学科团队、危险因素评估、术中脊髓保护、术后脊髓缺血评估、术后集束化措施、脑脊液穿刺引流、康复7个方面汇总了27条推荐意见。 结论 该研究全面、科学地汇总了TEVAR患者围手术期脊髓缺血评估及管理的相关证据，为临床医护人员有针对性地开展证据应用提供循证依据。
向玉萍 , 邓志强 , 曾玲 , 范景秀 . 胸主动脉腔内修复患者围手术期脊髓缺血评估与管理的最佳证据总结[J]. 中华急危重症护理杂志, 2025 , 6(6) : 744 -750 . DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.2096-7446.2025.06.020
Objective To evaluate and summarize the best evidence for the assessment and management of perioperative spinal cord ischemia（SCI） in patients with thoracic endovascular aortic repair（TEVAR）. Methods The databases at home and abroad and relevant professional websites were systematically searched for clinical decision-making，guidelines，expert consensus，evidence summaries，and original studies on the assessment and management of perioperative SCI in patients with TEVAR. The retrieval time limit was from January 1，2014 to May 23，2024. Two researchers performed quality assessment，data extraction，evidence grading and summarization of the included literature. Results A total of 15 studies were included，including one clinical decision，five guidelines，six expert consensuses，two systematic reviews，and one cohort study. Twenty-seven recommendations were summarized in seven areas，including multidisciplinary team，assessment of risk factors，intraoperative spinal cord protection，assessment of spinal cord ischemia，postoperative cluster measures，cerebrospinal fluid puncture and drainage，and rehabilitation. Conclusion This study comprehensively and scientifically summarizes the best evidence for the assessment and management of spinal cord ischemia after TEVAR，provides an evidence-based basis for clinical healthcare professionals to target the application of evidence.
| [1] | Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black J 3rd,et al. 2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease:a report of the American heart association/American college of cardiology joint committee on clinical practice guidelines[J]. Circulation,2022, 146(24):e334-e482. |
| [2] | MacGillivray TE, Gleason TG, Patel HJ,et al. The society of thoracic surgeons/American association for thoracic surgery cli-nical practice guidelines on the management of type B aortic dissection[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2022, 113(4):1073-1092. |
| [3] | Mousa AY, Morcos R, Broce M,et al. New preoperative spinal cord ischemia risk stratification model for patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair[J]. Vasc Endovascular Surg, 2020, 54(6):487-496. |
| [4] | Scali ST, Giles KA, Wang GJ,et al. National incidence,morta-lity outcomes,and predictors of spinal cord ischemia after tho-racic endovascular aortic repair[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2020, 72(1):92-104. |
| [5] | Brisard L, El Batti S, Borghese O,et al. Risk factors for spinal cord injury during endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysm:review of the literature and proposal of a prognostic score[J]. J Clin Med, 2023, 12(24):7520. |
| [6] | Pasqualucci A, Al-Sibaie A, Vaidyan KPT,et al. Epidural corti-costeroids,lumbar spinal drainage,and selective hemodynamic control for the prevention of spinal cord ischemia in thora-coabdominal endovascular aortic repair:a new clinical protocol[J]. Adv Ther, 2020, 37(1):272-287. |
| [7] | Scali ST, Kim M, Kubilis P,et al. Implementation of a bundled protocol significantly reduces risk of spinal cord ischemia after branched or fenestrated endovascular aortic repair[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2018, 67(2):409-423.e4. |
| [8] | Mokashi SA, Svensson LG. Guidelines for the management of thoracic aortic disease in 2017[J]. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2019, 67(1):59-65. |
| [9] | Upchurch GR Jr, Escobar GA, Azizzadeh A,et al. Society for Vascular Surgery clinical practice guidelines of thoracic endo-vascular aortic repair for descending thoracic aortic aneurysms[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2021, 73(1S):55S-83S. |
| [10] | 中华医学会心血管病学分会大血管学组, 中国医师协会心血管内科医师分会指南与共识工作委员会. 胸主动脉腔内治疗围手术期管理中国专家共识[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2019, 99(32):2489-2496. |
| Chinese Medical Association Cardiovascular Disease Branch Macrovascular Group, Guidelines and Consensus Working Com-mittee of Cardiovascular Physicians Branch of Chinese Me-dical Association. China expert consensus on perioperative management of endovascular treatment of thoracic aorta[J]. Natl Med J China, 2019, 99(32):2489-2496. | |
| [11] | Czerny M, Pacini D, Aboyans V,et al. Current options and recommendations for the use of thoracic endovascular aortic repair in acute and chronic thoracic aortic disease:an expert consensus document of the European Society for Cardiology(ESC) Working Group of Cardiovascular Surgery,the ESC Working Group on Aorta and Peripheral Vascular Diseases,the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions(EAPCI) of the ESC and the European Associa-tion for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery(EACTS)[J]. Eur J Cardio-thorac Surg, 2021, 59(1):65-73. |
| [12] | 朱政, 胡雁, 邢唯杰,等. 不同类型循证问题的构成[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2017, 32(21):1991-1994. |
| Zhu Z, Hu Y, Xing WJ,et al. The composition of different types of evidence based problems[J]. J Nurses Train, 2017, 32(21):1991-1994. | |
| [13] | The AGREE Collaboration. The AGREE Ⅱ instrument[EB/OL].(2017-11-30) [2024-11-21]. https://www.agreetrust.org/wpcontent/uploads/2017/12/AGREE-Ⅱ-Users-Manual-and-23-item-In strument-2009-Update-2017.pdf. |
| [14] | Foster MJ, Shurtz S. Making the Critical Appraisal for Sum-maries of Evidence(CASE) for evidence-based medicine (EBM):critical appraisal of summaries of evidence[J]. J Med Libr Assoc, 2013, 101(3):192-198. |
| [15] | 朱政, 胡雁, 周英凤,等. 推动证据向临床转化(五)证据临床转化研究中的文献质量评价[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2020, 35(11):996-1000. |
| Zhu Z, Hu Y, Zhou YF,et al. Promotion evidence to clinical transformation:evidence resource retrieval for the purpose of clinical transformation[J]. J Nurses Train, 2020, 35(11):996-1000. | |
| [16] | 王春青, 胡雁. JBI证据预分级及证据推荐级别系统(2014版)[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2015, 30(11):964-967. |
| Wang CQ, Hu Y. JBI evidence pre-classification and evidence recommendation level system(2014 edition)[J]. J Nurses Train, 2015, 30(11):964-967. | |
| [17] | Ochroch EA. Anesthesia for endovascular aortic repair[EB/OL].(2024-06-06)[2024-11-21]. https://kyuptodate.didavvis.cn/contents/anesthesia-for-endovascular-aortic-repair. |
| [18] | Riambau V, B?ckler D, Brunkwall J,et al. Editor’s choice-ma-nagement of descending thoracic aorta diseases:clinical practice guidelines of the European society for vascular surgery(ESVS)[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2017, 53(1):4-52. |
| [19] | 王金萍, 李海燕. Stanford B型主动脉夹层腔内治疗围术期护理规范专家共识[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2023, 32(9):833-840. |
| Wang JP, Li HY. Expert consensus on the perioperative care for the endovascular treatment of Stanford type B aortic dissection[J]. J Interv Radiol, 2023, 32(9):833-840. | |
| [20] | 中华医学会外科学分会血管外科学组. Stanford B型主动脉夹层诊断和治疗中国专家共识(2022版)[J]. 中国血管外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 14(2):119-130. |
| Vascular Surgery Group of Surgery Branch of Chinese Medical Association. China expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of Stanford type B aortic dissection (2022 edition)[J]. Chin J Vasc Surg Electron Version, 2022, 14(2):119-130. | |
| [21] | Etz CD, Weigang E, Hartert M,et al. Contemporary spinal cord protection during thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic sur-gery and endovascular aortic repair:a position paper of the vascular domain of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2015, 47(6):943-957. |
| [22] | Czerny M, Schmidli J, Adler S,et al. Current options and re-commendations for the treatment of thoracic aortic pathologies involving the aortic arch:an expert consensus document of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic surgery(EACTS) and the European Society for Vascular Surgery(ESVS)[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2019, 55(1):133-162. |
| [23] | Rong LQ, Kamel MK, Rahouma M,et al. Cerebrospinal-fluid drain-related complications in patients undergoing open and endovascular repairs of thoracic and thoraco-abdominal aortic pathologies:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2018, 120(5):904-913. |
| [24] | Santos LV, Pereira ET, Reguera-García MM,et al. Resistance training and muscle strength in people with spinal cord injury:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Bodyw Mov Ther, 2022, 29:154-160. |
| [25] | Yang GK, Misskey J, Arsenault K,et al. Outcomes of a spinal drain and intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring protocol in thoracic endovascular aortic repair[J]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2019, 61:124-133. |
| [26] | Ando M, Kise Y, Kuniyoshi Y,et al. Usefulness of motor evo-ked potential measurement and analysis of risk factors for spinal cord ischaemia from 300 cases of thoracic endova-scular aortic repair[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2024, 68(2):171-179. |
| [27] | Chen XY, Wang JR, Premaratne S,et al. Meta-analysis of the outcomes of revascularization after intentional coverage of the left subclavian artery for thoracic endovascular aortic repair[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2019, 70(4):1330-1340. |
| [28] | Alanezi T, Altoijry A, AlSheikh S,et al. Predicting the need for subclavian artery revascularization in thoracic endovas-cular aortic repair:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2024, 80(3):922-936.e5. |
| [29] | Batubara EAD, Nugraha RA, Amshar M,et al. Ischemic com-plications following thoracic endovascular aortic repair with and without revascularization of left subclavian artery:a sys-tematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2022, 86:417-427. |
| [30] | Aucoin VJ, Eagleton MJ, Farber MA,et al. Spinal cord protec-tion practices used during endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms by the U.S. Aortic Research Consortium[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2021, 73(1):323-330. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |