Objective The evaluation tool of Hand Burn Severity（HABS）was introduced and its severity classification was identified after clinical application,and its clinical guiding significance was analyzed. Methods Forward translation,back translation and cross-cultural adaptation of HABS were conducted based on the Brislin translation model. Convenience sampling method was applied to select 40 patients with hand burn from June to August 2020 for pre-survey. The Chinese Hand Burn Severity（C-HABS）assessment tool was developed and the consistency among raters was judged. From September 2020 to December 2021,335 patients with hand burn were formally recruited to analyze the severity classification of hand burn,and C-HABS usability evaluation form was used to determine the clinical effect and practical guiding significance. Results In the preliminary application results,the Kappa value between the two raters was 0.695>0.60,which indicated a strong consistency level among raters. A total of 342 application forms of C-HABS evaluation tool were administered for official application,and 335 questionnaires were actually collected,with effective response rate of 97.95%. C-HABS scoring criteria：0~11 was rated as mild burn;12~21 moderate burn;22~28 severe burn;29~36 extremely severe burn. There were 96% of the 50 staff from Burn Department agreed that the C-HABS assessment tool considered hand anatomy;84% thought that the assessment result of hand burn was more accurate;90% of them thought that the quantitative evaluation of C-HABS hand burn was more instructive in clinical practice. Conclusion C-HABS assessment tool can quantify and grade the severity of hand burn patients,which is helpful for early identification of risks,timely initiation of emergency rescue,and effective implementation of inter-agency transport and hierarchical diagnosis and treatment.
ZHANG Juan
,
CAI Juan
,
LI Haifen
,
YAO Miao
. The introduction and preliminary clinical application of Hand Burn Severity Assessment Tool[J]. Chinese Journal of Emergency and Critical Care Nursing, 2023
, 4(5)
: 399
-404
.
DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.2096-7446.2023.05.003
[1] 黄珍霞,许乐,李琳,等. 手部烧伤患者运动功能临床康复评价方法的研究进展[J]. 中华护理杂志,2014,49(5):583-587.
Huang ZX,Xu L,Li L,et al.The rehabilitation assessment methods in hand burn patients:a review[J]. Chin J Nurs,2014, 49(5):583-587.
[2] Di Castri A,Quarta L,Mataro I,et al.The entity of thermal-crush-avulsion hand injury(hot-press roller burns）treated with fast acting debriding enzymes(nexobrid):literature review and report of first case[J]. Ann Burns Fire Disasters,2018,31(1):31.
[3] Bhattacharya S.Avoiding unfavorable results in postburn contracture hand[J]. Indian J Plast Surg,2013,46(2):434-444.
[4] Bregoli C,Biffi CA,Morellato K,et al.Osseointegrated metallic implants for finger amputees:a review of the literature[J]. Orthop Surg,2022,14(6):1019-1033.
[5] 郑银. 烧伤严重程度分类的多因素分析[D]. 重庆:中国人民解放军陆军军医大学,2019.
Zheng Y.Multivariate analysis of severity classification of burns[D]. Chongqing:Army Medical University,2019.
[6] Chauhan N,Agrawal K,Kumar S.The “safdarjung method” of estimation of total body surface area(TBSA）burns in major amputees[J]. Indian J Plast Surg,2020,53(2):303-305.
[7] Bache SE,Fitzgerald O'Connor E,Theodorakopoulou E,et al. The Hand Burn Severity(HABS）score:a simple tool for stratifying severity of hand burns[J]. Burns,2017,43(1):93-99.
[8] Jones PS,Lee JW,Phillips LR,et al.An adaptation of Brislin's translation model for cross-cultural research[J]. Nurs Res,2001,50(5):300-304.
[9] 吴明隆. SPSS统计应用实务:问卷分析与应用统计[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2003.
Wu ML.SPSS statistical application practice:questionnaire analysis and applied statistics[M]. Beijing:Science Press,2003.
[10] 卢生芳,郭玉刚,李长风,等. 改良早期预警评分和生理评分系统及危险患者评分对急诊科抢救室患者预后评估的应用价值研究[J]. 中国全科医学,2016,19(12):1414-1419.
Lu SF,Guo YG,Li CF,et al.Application value of MEWS,PSS,PARS in the prognosis evaluation of patients in rescue room of emergency department[J]. Chin Gen Pract,2016,19(12):1414-1419.
[11] 张建芬,张元海,何小莺,等. 手部氢氟酸烧伤的护理[J]. 中华护理杂志,2015,50(7):812-816.
Zhang JF,Zhang YH,He XY,et al.Nursing of patients suffering hydrofluoric acid burn on hand[J]. Chin J Nurs,2015,50(7):812-816.
[12] 李炳宏. 血浆脑钠肽检测在烧伤患者病情严重程度评估中的应用价值[J]. 航空航天医学杂志,2020,31(3):299-300.
Li BH.The application value of plasma brain natriuretic peptide in evaluating the severity of burn patients[J]. J Aerosp Med,2020,31(3):299-300.
[13] 汤勇,王良喜,谢卫国,等. 多中心老年和中青年严重烧伤住院患者流行病学调查分析[J]. 中华烧伤杂志,2017,33(9):537-544.
Tang Y,Wang LX,Xie WG,et al.Multicenter epidemiological investigation of hospitalized elderly,young and middle-aged patients with severe burn[J]. Chin J Burns,2017,33(9):537-544.
[14] Bijani M,Mohammadi F.Ethical challenges of caring for burn patients:a qualitative study[J]. BMC Med Ethics,2021,22(1):13.
[15] Güldoğan CE,Kendirci M,Gündoğdu E,et al.Analysis of factors associated with mortality in major burn patients[J]. Turk J Surg,2018:1-8.
[16] Meng FY,Zuo KJ,Amar-Zifkin A,et al.Pediatric burn contractures in low-and lower middle-income countries:a systematic review of causes and factors affecting outcome[J]. Burns,2020,46(5):993-1004.
[17] 金静芬,陈玉国,朱华栋,等. 急诊预检分诊标准(成人部分)[J]. 中华急危重症护理杂志,2020,1(1):45-48.
Jin JF,Chen YG,Zhu HD,et al.Emergency triage scale (adult part)[J]. Chin J Emerg Crit Care Nurs,2020,1(1):45-48.
