eISSN 2097-6046
ISSN 2096-7446
CN 10-1655/R
Responsible Institution:China Association for Science and Technology
Sponsor:Chinese Nursing Association
Research Paper

A study on the application of analgesia and sedation strategy in patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy for large-area cerebral infarction

  • ZHUO Yiyi ,
  • WANG Yujiao ,
  • WANG Pengju ,
  • GAO Lan
Expand
  • 1 Neurology Intensive Care Unitthe First Hospital of Jilin UniversityChangchun 130000, China
    2 Nursing Departmentthe First Hospital of Jilin UniversityChangchun 130000, China

Received date: 2025-06-16

  Online published: 2026-06-02

Supported by

Jilin Province Healthcare Professionals Special Program(JLSRCZX2025-055)

Abstract

Objective To explore the impact of a stepwise analgesia and sedation nursing strategy guided by multimodality neuromonitoring(MMM) on intracranial pressure(ICP) changes and prognosis after decompressive craniectomy in patients with large-area cerebral infarction. Methods A total of 84 patients with large-area cerebral infarction who underwent decompressive craniectomy and were admitted to the neurology ICU of a tertiary hospital in Changchun from January 2022 to December 2024 were selected by convenience sampling and randomly divided into a control group and an experimental group using block randomization. The control group received conventional analgesia and sedation,while the experimental group adopted a stepwise analgesia and sedation nursing strategy guided by MMM. The average ICP within 7 days after surgery,the proportion of time within 72 hours that ICP reached the target,mechanical ventilation time,ICU stay,Barthel lndex at 72 hours after surgery and at discharge,and Modified Rankin Scale(mRS) score at 90 days were compared between the two groups. Results The average ICP in the experimental group was lower at 7 days post-operation(12.76±2.45 vs 14.91±4.56 mmHg,P=0.002),and the rate of reaching the ICP target within 72 hours was higher than the control group(52.4% vs 33.3%,P=0.038),with an absolute risk difference increase of 19.1%,which mean that for every 5.2 patients treated,one more patient could reach the target. The hospital stay in the experimental group was shorter than that of control group(21.93±2.51 vs 23.60±3.91 days,P=0.006). There was no statistically significant difference in mechanical ventilation time and Barthel Index score at 72 hours post-operation(P=0.104,P=0.714),but the Barthel Index score at discharge was higher in the experimental group(35.83±21.04 vs 24.76±24.69,P=0.022). The proportion of patients with mRS≤3(mild to moderate disability) at 90 days was higher in the experimental group(30.9% vs 14.8%),and the propor-tion of patients with mRS≥4(moderate to severe disability and death) was lower(40.5% vs 52.4%,P=0.036). Conclusion The stepped analgesia and sedation protocol based on MMM can optimize ICP management,shorten ICU stay,and improve neurological prognosis,which provide a basis for the care of patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy for large-area cerebral infarction.

Cite this article

ZHUO Yiyi , WANG Yujiao , WANG Pengju , GAO Lan . A study on the application of analgesia and sedation strategy in patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy for large-area cerebral infarction[J]. Chinese Journal of Emergency and Critical Care Nursing, 2026 , 7(6) : 645 -652 . DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.2096-7446.2026.06.001

References

[1] 国家卫生健康委员会. 脑血管病防治指南(2024年版)[J]. 磁共振成像, 2025, 16(1):1-8.
  National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. Guideline for prevention and treatment of cerebrovascular disease(2024 edition)[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imag, 2025, 16(1):1-8.
[2] 郭睿, 于志渊, 吴思缈, 等. 大面积脑梗死恶性脑水肿外科减压术规范化循证治疗建议草案[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2021, 21(5):503-513.
  Guo R, Yu ZY, Wu SM, et al. Evidence-based consensus statement of the standardized surgical decompression for massive cerebral infarction with malignant brain edema[J]. Chin J Evid Based Med, 2021, 21(5):503-513.
[3] 胡辉平, 张昊奇, 李奕霖, 等. 高渗盐水对比甘露醇治疗颅内压升高患者的疗效和安全性:基于随机对照试验的Meta分析的伞形Meta分析[J]. 中国医院药学杂志, 2022, 42(16):1685-1691,1708.
  Hu HP, Zhang HQ, Li YL, et al. Effects and safety of hypertonic saline versus mannitol in patients with elevated intracranial pressure:an umbrella Meta-analysis of Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Chin J Hosp Pharm, 2022, 42(16):1685-1691,1708.
[4] 张明, 葛继晖, 韩冰, 等. 颅内压相关参数在大面积脑梗死去骨瓣减压术后的临床应用[J]. 中华实验外科杂志, 2024, 41(5):1058-1063.
  Zhang M, Ge JH, Han B, et al. Clinical application of intracranial pressure related Exp Surg parameters after decompressive craniectomy for massive cerebral infarction[J]. Chin J, 2024, 41(5):1058-1063.
[5] Lehrieder D, Müller HP, Kassubek J, et al. Large diameter hemicraniectomy does not improve long-term outcome in malignant infarction[J]. J Neurol, 2023, 270(8):4080-4089.
[6] 申皓宇, 黄子芮, 梁文佳, 等. 颅内压监测在颅脑创伤去骨瓣减压术中的作用[J]. 中华神经外科杂志, 2024, 40(6):581-585.
  Shen HY, Huang ZR, Liang JW, et al. The role of intracranial pressure monitoring in the treatment of craniocerebral injury with decom-pressive craniectomy[J]. Chin J Neurosurg, 2024, 40(6):581-585.
[7] Behouche A, Schilte C, Payen JF. Intracranial pressure and sedation management[J]. Anesth Reanim, 2022, 8(4):396-401.
[8] 张翼, 罗耀兵, 张岚, 等. 颅内压对重型颅脑损伤患者去骨瓣减压术后预后不良的预测价值[J]. 中华实验外科杂志, 2024, 41(11):2475.
  Zhang Y, Luo YB, Zhang L, et al. The predictive value of intracranial pressure on poor prognosis after decompressive craniectomy in patients with severe traumatic brain iniury[J]. Chin J Exp Surg, 2024, 41(11):2475.
[9] Bogli SY, Beqiri E, Olakorede I, et al. Unlocking the potential of high-resolution multimodality neuromonitoring for traumatic brain injury management:lessons and insights from cases,events,and patterns[J]. Critical Care, 2025, 29(1):139.
[10] 刘鹏飞, 冯军峰, 王伟丰. 镇痛镇静治疗对重型颅脑创伤患者颅内压的影响[J]. 中华神经外科杂志, 2020, 36(10):1026-1029.
  Liu PF, Feng JF, Wang WF, et al. Effect of analgesic and sedative treatments onintracranial pressure in patients with severe traumatic brain injury[J]. Chin J Neurosurg, 2020, 36(10):1026-1029.
[11] 丁楠楠, 姚丽, 姜变通, 等. 国内外每日唤醒研究的聚类分析[J]. 护理研究, 2020, 34(6):1095-1101.
  Ding NN, Yao L, Jiang BT, et al. Clustering analysis of reasearches on daily interruption in China and abroad[J]. Chin Nurs Res, 2020, 34(6):1095-1101.
[12] 张晓梅, 周春兰, 周宏珍, 等. 脑卒中病人误吸预防的标准化护理流程及措施:基于循证及德尔菲函询法的专家共识[J]. 护理研究, 2020, 34(1):1-8.
  Zhang XM, Zhou CL, Zhou HZ, et al. Standardized nursing procedures and measures for prevention of aspiration in stroke patients:an expert consensus based on evidence and Delphi consultation[J]. Chin Nurs Res, 2020, 34(1):1-8.
[13] 赵昆, 马宾, 王纪明, 等. 重症监护室机械通气严重脓毒症患者右美托咪定应用镇静镇痛效果[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2024, 34(21):3221-3225.
  Zhao K, Ma B, Wang JM, et al. Effect of dexmedetomidine on sedation and analgesia of intensive care unit severe sepsis patients undergoing mechanical ventilation[J]. Chin J Nosocomiol, 2024, 34(21):3221-3225.
[14] Vollbrecht H, Patel BK. Management of sedation during weaning from mechanical ventilation[J]. Curr Opin Crit Care, 2025, 31(1):78-85.
[15] 戚智冬, 杨斯博, 郜杨. 镇痛镇静治疗的脏器保护作用[J]. 中国急救医学, 2019, 39(9):908-912.
  Qi ZD, Yang SB, Gao Y. The protection effect of organ function of analgesic and sedative therapy[J]. Chin J Crit Care Med, 2019, 39(9):908-912.
[16] Fu X, Zhong H, Meng M, et al. Effects of the ecash nursing model on self-care ability,physical function,psychological function,and cognitive function of critically ill patients in an emergency intensive care unit[J]. Acta Medica Mediterranea, 2023, 39(1):195-202.
[17] Dolmans RGF, Barber J, Foreman B, et al. Sedation intensity in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury in the intensive care unit:a TRACK-TBI cohort study[J]. Neurocrit Care, 2025, 42(2):551-561.
[18] Jayavel V, Sangeetha S, Ramnath, et al. Dexmedetomidine compared to various methods of sedative & analgesic strategy in intensive care units:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Tpm-Testing Psychome Method Appl Psychol, 2025, 32(S5):176-193
[19] 黄瑾, 张珈硕, 姜卜维, 等. 环泊酚临床应用研究进展[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志, 2023, 43(9):1149-52.
  Huang J, Zhang JS, Jiang BW, et al. Progress on clinical application of ciprofol[J]. Chin J Anesthesiol, 2023, 43(9):1149-1152.
Outlines

/