黄洁：论文撰写；劳月文、陈香萍、宫晓艳：研究设计、查阅文献、统计学分析、研究指导、论文修改、专家函询；章燕飞、张敏燕、江媚：数据收集、数据整理
收稿日期: 2025-12-01
网络出版日期: 2026-07-01
Development and validation of a knowledge，attitude，and practice questionnaire on procedural pain management among ICU nurses
Received date: 2025-12-01
Online published: 2026-07-01
目的 编制ICU护士操作性疼痛管理知信行问卷并检验其信效度，为评估ICU护士操作性疼痛管理知信行提供可靠的研究工具。方法 基于知信行理论，通过文献分析、专家函询形成ICU护士操作性疼痛管理知信行初始调查问卷。采用便利抽样法，于2025年7月—8月，选取浙江省5所三级甲等医院的800名ICU护士开展调查，对量表进行信效度检验。结果 发放问卷800份，回收有效问卷787份，有效问卷回收率为98.38%。最终形成的问卷包括知识、态度、行为3个维度，共36个条目。2轮函询专家权威系数分别为0.88、0.90，肯德尔和谐系数为0.280、0.450，积极系数均为100%。问卷的内容效度为0.875~1.000，平均内容效度为0.901。因子分析表明问卷结构良好，累计方差贡献率为72.56%，验证性因子分析模型拟合佳。问卷总的Cronbach’s α系数为0.972，分半信度为0.843，重测信度为0.915。结论 该研究编制的ICU护士操作性疼痛管理知信行问卷具有良好的信度与效度，可作为ICU护士操作性疼痛管理知信行水平的测评工具。
黄洁 , 劳月文 , 陈香萍 , 章燕飞 , 张敏燕 , 江媚 , 宫晓艳 . ICU护士操作性疼痛管理知信行问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 中华急危重症护理杂志, 2026 , 7(7) : 820 -826 . DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.2096-7446.2026.07.007
Objective To develop a questionnaire on knowledge，attitude，and practice（KAP） regarding procedural pain management among ICU nurses and examine its reliability and validity，so as to provide a reliable tool for assessing the KAP levels in this area. Methods Based on the KAP theoretical framework，the initial questionnaire was developed through literature review and Delphi expert consultation. A convenience sampling method was used to select 800 clinical nurses from five tertiary hospitals in Zhejiang Province for a survey conducted from July to August 2025，and reliability and validity tests were performed. Results A total of 800 questionnaires were distributed，yielding 787 valid responses，for an effective response rate of 98.38%. The final questionnaire included 36 items across knowledge，attitude，and practice dimensions. The expert authority coefficients for the two Delphi rounds were 0.88 and 0.90，with Kendall’s W of 0.280 and 0.450，and positive coefficients of 100% for both rounds. The content validity index ranged from 0.875 to 1.000，with an average of 0.901. Factor analysis indicated good structural validity，with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 72.56% and a good model fit in the confirmatory factor analysis. The Cronbach’s α of the questionnaire was 0.972 for the overall scale，split-half reliability was 0.843，and test-retest reliability was 0.915. Conclusion The KAP Questionnaire about procedural pain management exhibits good reliability and validity，and can serve as a reliable instrument for evaluating ICU nurses’ knowledge，attitudes，and practices in procedural pain management.
Key words： Intensive Care Units; Procedural Pain; Scale Development; Reliability; Validity
| [1] | Puntillo KA, Max A, Timsit JF, et al. Determinants of procedural pain intensity in the intensive care unit. The EuropainR study[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2014, 189(1):39-47. |
| [2] | Herlianita R, Chang CJ, Pangaribuan SM, et al. Occurrence rate and risk factors for rest and procedural pain in critically ill patients:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Intensive Crit Care Nurs, 2025, 88:104002. |
| [3] | Ayasrah SM. Pain among non-verbal critically Ill mechanically ventilated patients:Prevalence,correlates and predictors[J]. J Crit Care, 2019, 49:14-20. |
| [4] | Devlin JW, Skrobik Y, Gélinas C, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of pain,agitation/sedation,delirium,immobility,and sleep disruption in adult patients in the ICU[J]. Crit Care Med, 2018, 46(9):e825-e873. |
| [5] | 兰星, 高兴莲, 刘云访, 等. 临床护理人员对围术期病人疼痛管理知信行问卷的编制与信效度检验[J]. 护理研究, 2023, 37(19):3435-3441. |
| Lan X, Gao XL, Liu YF, et al. Development of clinical nurses’ knowledge-attitude-practice questionnaire on pain management of perioperative patients and its reliability and validity test[J]. Chin Nurs Res, 2023, 37(19):3435-3441. | |
| [6] | ?i?man H, Akpolat R, Alptekin D. Determination of pain-related knowledge and behaviors of adult intensive care nurses[J]. Pain Manag Nurs, 2024, 25(3):e250-e255. |
| [7] | Rababa M, Al-Rawashdeh S. Critical care nurses’ critical thinking and decision making related to pain management[J]. Intensive Crit Care Nurs, 2021, 63:103000. |
| [8] | Alanizi AW, Shaqiqi W, Cabaldo LC, et al. Nurses’ knowledge and attitudes toward pain assessment and management:a cross-sectional study[J]. Nurs Res Pract, 2025, 2025:6646998. |
| [9] | 许建秋, 陈晓蕾, 占雷, 等. ICU护士舒适化浅镇静策略理念知信行调查问卷的构建及信效度分析[J]. 中华全科医学, 2021, 19(3):494-497. |
| Xu JQ, Chen XL, Zhan L, et al. The construction and reliability and validity analysis of the questionnaire on knowledge-belief-behavior of e CASH concept for ICU nurses[J]. Chin J Gen Pract, 2021, 19(3):494-497. | |
| [10] | Czarnecki ML, Turner HN, Collins PM, et al. Procedural pain management:a position statement with clinical practice recommendations[J]. Pain Manag Nurs, 2011, 12(2):95-111. |
| [11] | Wrona SK, Quinlan-Colwell A, Brown L, et al. Procedural pain management:clinical practice recommendations American society for pain management nursing[J]. Pain Manag Nurs, 2022, 23(3):254-258. |
| [12] | Wrona SK, Quinlan-Colwell A, Brown L, et al. Procedural pain management:clinical practice recommendations[J]. Pain Manag Nurs, 2022, 23(5):583-584. |
| [13] | Liu SN, Zhou H, Zhang XL, et al. Knowledge,attitudes and practices of nurses regarding airway clearance in neurocritical illness patients:a cross-sectional study[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2025, 34(2):464-472. |
| [14] | Fishman SM, Young HM, Lucas Arwood E, et al. Core competencies for pain management:results of an interprofessional consensus summit[J]. Pain Med, 2013, 14(7):971-981. |
| [15] | 万雅莉, 刘云访, 陈怿, 等. 护理人员传染病突发事件防控能力问卷编制及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2023, 58(5):536-543. |
| Wan YL, Liu YF, Chen Y, et al. Development and reliability and validity tests of Questionnaire on Prevention and Control Competence of Nursing Staff for Infectious Disease Emergencies[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2023, 58(5):536-543. | |
| [16] | 吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务:SPSS操作与应用[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2010. |
| Wu ML. Practice of questionnaire statistical analysis:SPSS operation and application[M]. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press, 2010. | |
| [17] | 吴明隆. 结构方程模型:Amos实务进阶[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2013. |
| Wu ML. Structural equation model:advanced Amos practice[M]. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press, 2013. | |
| [18] | 陈雨沁, 刘义兰, 丁芳, 等. 临床护士整体人文关怀感知量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2023, 58(8):935-941. |
| Chen YQ, Liu YL, Ding F, et al. Development and reliability and validity test of Holistic Human Caring Perception Scale for clinical nurses[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2023, 58(8):935-941. | |
| [19] | Leong AY, Edginton S, Lee LA, et al. Prevalence and incidence of ICU delirium and pain:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2025, 51(11):2093-2103. |
| [20] | Giannelou E, Papathanassoglou E, Karanikola M, et al. Chronic pain in ICU survivors:potential risk factors and relationship with post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms and health related quality of life[J]. Intensive Crit Care Nurs, 2025, 88:104003. |
| [21] | 孟雪莲, 陶诗琪, 李娜, 等. ICU成人患者操作性疼痛管理的最佳证据总结[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2023, 29(16):2138-2144. |
| Meng XL, Tao SQ, Li N, et al. Summary of best evidence for procedural pain management in adult patients in ICU[J]. Chin J Mod Nurs, 2023, 29(16):2138-2144. | |
| [22] | Puntillo KA, Max A, Chaize M, et al. Patient recollection of ICU procedural pain and post ICU burden:the memory study[J]. Crit Care Med, 2016, 44(11):1988-1995. |
| [23] | 刘敏君, 祁海鸥, 薛子豪, 等. 危重症术后患者ICU过渡期疼痛管理的研究进展[J]. 中华急危重症护理杂志, 2021, 2(2):162-166. |
| Liu MJ, Qi HO, Xue ZH, et al. Review on pain management in postoperative critical patients during ICU transition[J]. Chin J Emerg Crit Care Nurs, 2021, 2(2):162-166. | |
| [24] | 王莉, 何雪花, 陈香萍, 等. 成人ICU患者镇痛镇静护理质量评价指标体系的构建研究[J]. 中华急危重症护理杂志, 2023, 4(9):773-778. |
| Wang L, He XH, Chen XP, et al. Establishment of quality evaluation indicator system of analgesia and sedation care in adult ICUs[J]. Chin J Emerg Crit Care Nurs, 2023, 4(9):773-778. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |