收稿日期: 2024-11-25
网络出版日期: 2025-11-04
基金资助
2021年度华中科技大学同济医学院护理学院自主创新基金项目(2021-3-1)
Current situation and influencing factors of transitional care needs among patients after surgery for aortic dissection
Received date: 2024-11-25
Online published: 2025-11-04
目的 调查主动脉夹层术后患者延续性护理需求现状及影响因素,为制订患者个体化延续性护理实践方案提供参考。 方法 2022年3月—6月采用便利抽样法,选取湖北省武汉市某三级甲等综合医院心脏大血管外科即将出院的222例主动脉夹层术后患者,应用自制的主动脉夹层术后患者延续性护理需求问卷进行调查。结果 主动脉夹层术后患者延续性护理需求问卷总分为(116.81±12.54)分,总条目均分为(3.77±0.40)分,条目均分最高的维度是安全需求,其次是爱与归属需求、生理需求。主动脉夹层术后患者延续性护理服务渠道中,电话随访需求最高,为168例(75.67%),服务人员多选择住院医院的医护人员,为152例(68.47%);服务开始时间多为出院后2周内,为154例(69.37%),服务频率多为每月1次,为176例(79.28%),服务持续时间多为6个月,为94例(42.34%),129例(58.11%)患者愿付费,其中78例(60.47%)患者选择按项目收费。多因素分析结果显示,主动脉夹层术后患者延续性护理需求的影响因素为年龄、文化程度、在职、家庭人均月收入、开放手术(P<0.05)。结论 主动脉夹层术后患者延续性护理需求处于中等偏高需要程度,其中安全需求最为显著,患者延续性护理服务方式需求呈现多样化,受多种因素影响。提示医护人员应积极开展针对性、多样化的延续性护理服务,以满足患者个体化需求。
张玉芬 , 汪晖 , 胡凯利 , 吴前胜 . 主动脉夹层术后患者延续性护理需求现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中华急危重症护理杂志, 2025 , 6(11) : 1328 -1334 . DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.2096-7446.2025.11.008
Objective To investigate the current situation and influencing factors of transitional care needs of patients after surgery for aortic dissection,with a view to developing an optimal continuity of care practice program for patients. Methods Using convenience sampling,222 patients after surgery for aortic dissection who were about to be discharged from the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery of a tertiary class A general hospital in Wuhan,Hubei Province,from March 2022 to June 2022 were selected as the study subjects,and a self-designed questionnaire on the transitional care needs of patients after surgery for aortic dissection was applied to conduct the survey. Results In this study,the total of transitional care needs of patient after surgery for aortic dissection was(116.8±112.54) and the mean score of the total entries was(3.77±0.40). The item with the highest mean score of each dimension was the need for safety,followed by love and belonging needs,and physiological needs. The highest demand for service channels in the transitional care for patient after surgery for aortic dissection was telephone follow-up,with 168 cases(75.67%). The need of staff for transitional care service was mostly the medical and nursing staff of the inpatient hospital,accounting for 152 cases(68.47%). The start of the transitional care service was mostly within 2 weeks after discharge from the hospital,accounting for 154 cases(69.37%). The frequency of transitional care services was mostly once every 1 month,accounting for 176 cases(79.28%),and the duration of transitional care was mostly 6 months,accounting for 94 cases(42.34%). 129 patients(58.11%) were willing to pay for transitional care services,of which the majority of patients chose to pay by item,accounting for 78 cases(60.47%). The results of the multivariate analysis showed that the factors influencing the scores of patients' transitional care needs were age,education level,employment,per capita monthly household income,and open surgery(P<0.05). Conclusion The transitional care needs for patient after surgery for aortic dissection is moderately high,with the need for safety being the most significant,and the ways in which patients' transitional care needs services are diverse. The transitional care needs for patient after surgery for aortic dissection is influenced by multiple factors. This suggests that healthcare professionals should actively develop targeted and diversified transitional care services to meet the individual needs of patients.
Key words: Aortic Dissection; Transitional Care; Nursing Needs; Influencing Factors
| [1] | 中国医师协会心血管外科分会大血管外科专业委员会. 急性主动脉综合征诊断与治疗规范中国专家共识(2021版)[J]. 中华胸心血管外科杂志, 2021, 37(5):257-269. |
| Great Vessels Surgery Committee of Cardiovascular Surgery Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association. Chinese experts' consensus of standardized diagnosis and treatment for acute aortic syndrome(2021)[J]. Chin J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2021, 37(5):257-269. | |
| [2] | Musajee M, Katsogridakis E, Kiberu Y, et al. Acute kidney injury in patients with acute type B aortic dissection[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2023, 65(2):256-262. |
| [3] | Payne D, B?ckler D, Weaver F, et al. Five-year outcomes of endovascular treatment for aortic dissection from the Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2024, 80(4):1035-1044. |
| [4] | Haakseth L, Wanhainen A, Bj?rck M, et al. Understanding patients' experiences of recovery after staged complex aortic repair:a phenomenological study[J]. J Adv Nurs, 2019, 75(11):2834-2844. |
| [5] | J?nsson M, Berg SK, Missel M, et al. Am I going to die now? Experiences of hospitalisation and subsequent life after being diagnosed with aortic dissection[J]. Scand J Caring Sci, 2021, 35(3):929-936. |
| [6] | Zhang T, Liu Y, Wang Y, et al. Quality indicators for the care of older adults with disabilities in long-term care facilities based on Maslow's hierarchy of needs[J]. Int J Nurs Sci, 2022, 9(4):453-459. |
| [7] | 姜腾飞, 王伟, 张琦, 等. 植入心脏起搏器患者延续性护理需求现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(8):1-4. |
| Jiang TF, Wang W, Zhang Q, et al. Current status of extended nursing for patients with cardiac pacemaker and its influence factors[J]. J Nurs China, 2019, 26(8):1-4. | |
| [8] | 庞冉, 赵蕊, 吴筱筱, 等. 主动脉夹层病人疼痛护理研究进展[J]. 护理研究, 2019, 33(7):1183-1186. |
| Pang R, Zhao R, Wu XX, et al. Research progress on pain care for patients with aortic dissection[J]. Chin Nurs Res, 2019, 33(7):1183-1186. | |
| [9] | Krenz JR, O'Brien ME, Lee J, et al. Evaluation of esmolol for heart rate control in patients with acute aortic dissection[J]. Am J Emerg Med, 2021,44:312-314. |
| [10] | 吴前胜, 周雁荣, 王兰, 等. 主动脉夹层患者出院随访的最佳证据总结[J]. 中华急危重症护理杂志, 2023, 4(4):364-370. |
| Wu QS, Zhou YR, Wang L, et al. Best evidence summary on discharge follow-up of patients with aortic dissection[J]. Chin J Emerg Crit Care Nurs, 2023, 4(4):364-370. | |
| [11] | Martin G, Patel N, Grant Y, et al. Antihypertensive medication adherence in chronic type B aortic dissection is an important consideration in the management debate[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2018, 68(3):693-699.e2. |
| [12] | 洪妙璇, 张容. Stanford A型主动脉夹层病人术后医学应对方式对心理韧性的影响:一个有调节的中介效应模型[J]. 护理研究, 2023, 37(13):2329-2334. |
| Hong MX, Zhang R. Effect of medical coping style on resilience in patients after surgery for type A aortic dissection:a moderated mediation model[J]. Chin Nurs Res, 2023, 37(13):2329-2334. | |
| [13] | 胡辰洁, 仇胜利, 夏靓. 基于电话回访的延续性护理干预对主动脉夹层患者术后自我效能的影响研究[J]. 吉林医学, 2023, 44(1):274-277. |
| Hu CJ, Qiu SL, Xia L. Effect of continuous nursing intervention based on telephone return visit on postoperative self-efficacy of patients with aortic dissection[J]. Jilin Med J, 2023, 44(1):274-277. | |
| [14] | 张欢欢, 杨玉金, 杜春红, 等. 主动脉夹层覆膜支架患者术后生活质量和心理韧性的相关性[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2020, 40(24):5300-5302. |
| Zhang HH, Yang YJ, Du CH, et al. Correlation between postoperative quality of life and psychological resilience in patients with aortic dissection covered stent[J]. Chin J Gerontol, 2020, 40(24):5300-5302. | |
| [15] | Rocha RV, De Mestral C, Tam DY, et al. Health care costs of endovascular compared with open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2021, 73(6):1934-1941.e1. |
| [16] | 《中国心血管健康与疾病报告2021》编写组. 《中国心血管健康与疾病报告2021》要点解读[J]. 中国心血管杂志, 2022, 27(4):305-318. |
| The Writing Committee of the Report on Cardiovascular Health Diseases in China. Interpretation of report on cardiovascular health and diseases in China 2021[J]. Chin J Cardiovasc Med, 2022, 27(4):305-318. | |
| [17] | 张雄, 何昊, 黎明, 等. 2024版欧洲心脏病学会《外周动脉和主动脉疾病管理指南》解读[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2024, 33(12):1941-1949. |
| Zhang X, He H, Li M, et al. Interpretation of the 2024 European society of cardiology(ESC) guidelines on the management of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases[J]. China J Gen Surg, 2024, 33(12):1941-1949. | |
| [18] | 李志勇, 王晶, 周雅丽, 等. 主动脉夹层后血压管理的研究进展[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2024, 15(4):904-910. |
| Li ZY, Wang J, Zhou YL, et al. Research progress in blood pressure management after aortic dissection[J]. Med J Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, 2024, 15(4):904-910. | |
| [19] | 于辉, 李丽红. 心脏大血管外科临床护理实践[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2020. |
| Yu H, Li LH. Clinical nursing practices for cardiovascular surgery[M]. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 2020. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |