ISSN 2097-6046(网络)
ISSN 2096-7446(印刷)
CN 10-1655/R
主管:中国科学技术协会
主办:中华护理学会
急症护理研究

护士直觉评估患者病情恶化量表汉化及在急诊患者中的信效度检验

  • 马世林 ,
  • 郑栋莲 ,
  • 保金涛 ,
  • 吉双对 ,
  • 黄豆豆 ,
  • 米光丽
展开
  • 750000 银川市 宁夏医科大学护理学院(马世林,黄豆豆);宁夏医科大学总医院心脏大血管外科(郑栋莲,吉双对),急诊科(保金涛),护理部(米光丽)
马世林:男,本科(硕士在读),E-mail:3211644994@qq.com

收稿日期: 2024-04-29

  网络出版日期: 2025-01-22

基金资助

2022年宁夏回族自治区重点研发计划项目(2022BEG03095);宁夏回族自治区第七批青年科技人才托举工程项目(宁科协发组字[2023]6号)

The translation of Nurses’ Intuition Patient Deterioration Scale and its application in emergency patients

  • MA Shilin ,
  • ZHENG Donglian ,
  • BAO Jintao ,
  • JI Shuangdui ,
  • HUANG Doudou ,
  • MI Guangli
Expand

Received date: 2024-04-29

  Online published: 2025-01-22

摘要

目的 汉化护士直觉评估患者病情恶化量表(Nurse Intuition Patient Deterioration Scale,NIPDS)并检验其信效度,验证该量表在急诊患者病情恶化中的预测作用。方法 采用Brislin翻译模型对NIPDS进行翻译、回译和跨文化调试。2023年12月2日—2024年1月31日便利选取232例急诊科入院患者,值班护士直觉评估患者病情恶化时进行NIPDS登记,评价量表信效度。结果 中文版NIPDS为单维度量表,共9个条目。量表总的Cronbach’s α系数为0.891,折半信度为0.848;量表内容效度为0.920,条目内容效度为0.840~1.000,累计方差贡献率为54.305%,标准化因子载荷系数为0.544~0.790,受试者操作特征曲线下面积为0.753(95%CI=0.656~0.850,P<0.001),截断值为6分,约登指数为0.483,敏感度为0.622,特异度为0.861,量表效度良好。Rasch模型分析显示,条目信度和样本信度分别为0.98和0.77,条目难度载荷范围为-2.534~1.439,条目难度适宜。结论 中文版NIPDS具有良好的信效度,是有效且准确的工具,可以作为现有预警系统的辅助补充,帮助护士对急诊患者病情恶化做出早期判断。

关键词: 护理; 直觉; 恶化; 量表; 信度; 效度

本文引用格式

马世林 , 郑栋莲 , 保金涛 , 吉双对 , 黄豆豆 , 米光丽 . 护士直觉评估患者病情恶化量表汉化及在急诊患者中的信效度检验[J]. 中华急危重症护理杂志, 2025 , 6(2) : 194 -200 . DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.2096-7446.2025.02.011

Abstract

Objective To translate and test the reliability and validity of Nurse Intuition Patient Deterioration Scale(NIPDS),and to verify the predictive role of the scale in emergency patients’ deterioration. Methods The Brislin translation method was used to translate the NIPDS literally,back-translate and cross-culturally adjust to the Chinese version of the NIPDS. A total of 232 patients admitted to the emergency department were conveniently selected,and NIPDS registration was performed when the on-duty nurse intuited the deterioration of the patient’s condition,so as to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scale. Results The Chinese version of Nurse Intuition Patient Deterioration Scale was a single dimension scale with 9 items in total. The total Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.891,and the broken half reliability was 0.848. The content validity of the scale was 0.920,the item content validity was 0.840~1.000,and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 54.305%. Standardized factor load coefficient was 0.544~0.790. When area under the receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve was 0.753(95%CI =0.656~0.850,P<0.001),truncation value was 6 points,Youden index was 0.483,sensitivity was 0.622,specificity was 0.861,and scale validity was good. Rasch model analysis showed that the item reliability and sample reliability are 0.980 and 0.770 respectively,the item difficulty load ranges from -2.534 to 1.439,and the item difficulty was suitable. Conclusion The Chinese version of NIPDS has good reliability and validity,and is an effective and accurate tool,which can be used as an auxiliary supplement to the existing early warning system to help nurses make early judgment on the deterioration of emergency patients.

参考文献

[1] Bonafide CP, Localio AR, Song LH, et al. Cost-benefit analysis of a medical emergency team in a children’s hospital[J]. Pediatrics, 2014, 134(2):235-241.
[2] 蒋佳维. 内科病房重症事件的时间聚类[J]. 中华危重病急救医学, 2023, 35(11):1156.
  Jiang JW. Temporal clustering of critical illness events on medical wards[J]. Chin Crit Care Med, 2023, 35(11):1156.
[3] Royal Collegeof Physicians. National Early Warning Score (NEWS) 2:standardising the assessment of acute-illness seve-rity in the NHS. Updated report of a working party[EB/OL].(2022-12-22)[2024-02-01]. https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/projects/outputs/natio-nal-early-warning-score-news-2.
[4] 戴桂凤. 儿童早期预警评分在门诊手足口病患儿分流及病情评估中的应用[J]. 医学理论与实践, 2017, 30(13):1897-1899.
  Dai GF. Application of Pediatric Early Warning Score in hand-foot-mouth disease of outpation triage and disease evaluation[J]. J Med Theory Pract, 2017, 30(13):1897-1899.
[5] 林少虹, 林月双, 李春容, 等. MEWS病情自动预警系统的开发与应用[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(16):76-78.
  Lin SH, Lin YS, Li CR, et al. Development and application of MEWS disease automatic early warning system[J]. J Nurs China, 2019, 26(16):76-78.
[6] Haegdorens F, Monsieurs KG, Meester KD, et al. The optimal threshold for prompt clinical review:an external validation study of the national early warning score[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2020, 29(23/24):4594-4603.
[7] Petersen JA, Rasmussen LS, Rydahl-Hansen S. Barriers and fa-cilitating factors related to use of early warning score among acute care nurses:a qualitative study[J]. BMC Emerg Med, 2017, 17(1):36.
[8] Douw G, Huisman-de Waal G, et al. Nurses’ ‘worry’ as predictor of deteriorating surgical ward patients:a prospective cohort study of the Dutch-Early-Nurse-Worry-Indicator-Score[J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2016, 59:134-140.
[9] Haegdorens F, Wils C, Franck E. Predicting patient deterio-ration by nurse intuition:the development and validation of the Nurse Intuition Patient Deterioration Scale[J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2023, 142:104467.
[10] Romero-Brufau S, Gaines K, Nicolas CT, et al. The fifth vital sign? Nurse worry predicts inpatient deterioration within 24 hours[J]. JAMIA Open, 2019, 2(4):465-470.
[11] Klotz AC, Swider BW, Kwon SH. Back-translation practices in organizational research:avoiding loss in translation[J]. J Appl Psychol, 2023, 108(5):699-727.
[12] 施月仙, 张海明, 黄亚琪, 等. 选择健康测量工具的共识标准(COSMIN)偏倚风险评价清单的解读[J]. 中国护理管理, 2021, 21(7):1053-1057.
  Shi YX, Zhang HM, Huang YQ, et al. Interpretation of COSMIN risk of bias checklist[J]. Chin Nurs Manag, 2021, 21(7):1053-1057.
[13] 王飞, 汤靖琪, 孙小楠, 等. 初级卫生保健领域量表的设计与开发:实用步骤与统计方法[J]. 中国全科医学, 2024, 27(13):1573-1583.
  Wang F, Tang JQ, Sun XN, et al. Design and development of scales in primary care:practical steps and statistical methods[J]. Chin Gen Pract, 2024, 27(13):1573-1583.
[14] Abd Rahman MH, Amirtharatnam P, Sharanjeet-Kaur S, et al. Development of Knowledge,Attitude and Practice Question-naire for Age-related Macular Degeneration Patients[J]. Int J Ophthalmol, 2023, 16(4):589-600.
[15] 张国春, 李海云, 褚梁梁, 等. 产科护士围产期姑息照护知信行量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2):6-11.
  Zhang GC, Li HY, Chu LL, et al. Development of Knowledge,Belief and Practice Scale for Perinatal Palliative Care of Obstetric Nurses and its reliability and validity[J]. J Nurs China, 2024, 31(2):6-11.
[16] 张佳惠, 庞书勤, 洪雪珮, 等. 老年前期人群退休规划过程量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(10):1-6.
  Zhang JH, Pang SQ, Hong XP, et al. Translation of Process of Retirement Planning Scale for Pre-Elderly People and its reliability and validity[J]. J Nurs China, 2023, 30(10):1-6.
[17] 宁夏回族自治区统计局, 国家统计局宁夏调查总队. 宁夏统计年鉴-2020[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2020:231-243.
  Ningxia Bureau of Statistics,National Bureau of Statistics Ningxia Survey Corps. Ningxia statistical yearbook of 2020[M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2020:231-243.
[18] 吕晴晴, 丁萍, 宋海燕, 等. 感染预防和控制护理缺失量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学杂志, 2023, 38(11):67-72.
  Lü QQ, Ding P, Song HY, et al. Reliability and validity testing of the Chinese version of Missed Nursing Care in Infection Prevention and Control Survey[J]. J Nurs Sci, 2023, 38(11):67-72.
[19] 张咏梅, 彭峥嵘, 吴沛霞, 等. 喉切除术后吞咽结局量表的汉化和信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(7):1115-1120.
  Zhang YM, Peng ZR, Wu PX, et al. Translation and reliability and validity testing of Chinese version of Swallowing Out-come after Total Laryngectomy Scale[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2021, 56(7):1115-1120.
[20] Qassem AI. Psychometric analysis of Childhood Executive Fun-ctioning Inventory(CHEXI) in Saudi Arabian ADHD children:calibration with Rasch model[J]. Appl Neuropsychol Child, 2023:1-8.
[21] 杨昭霞, 吴春梅, 戴靖华, 等. 斯卡特触发点用于胃肠外科手术患者的信效度检验[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2020, 35(12):1100-1104.
  Yang ZX, Wu CM, Dai JH, et al. The reliability and validity of Scott Triggers tool for gastrointestinal surgery patients[J]. J Nurses Train, 2020, 35(12):1100-1104.
[22] Jensen JK, Sk?r R, Tveit B. Introducing the National Early Warning Score:a qualitative study of hospital nurses’ perce-ptions and reactions[J]. Nurs Open, 2019, 6(3):1067-1075.
[23] Turcato G, Zaboli A, Brigo F, et al. Is the National Early Warning Score able to identify nursing activity load? A prospective observational study[J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2024, 154:104749.
文章导航

/