ISSN 2097-6046（网络）
ISSN 2096-7446（印刷）
CN 10-1655/R
主管：中国科学技术协会
主办：中华护理学会
中华急危重症护理杂志

中华急危重症护理杂志 >

2024 , Vol. 5 >Issue 10: 882 - 888

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3761/j.issn.2096-7446.2024.10.003

论著

天疱疮患者皮肤多重耐药菌感染两种预测模型的构建及验证

  • 张肖莹 ,
  • 李柏樟 ,
  • 方卉 ,
  • 杨婷婷 ,
  • 冯佳星 ,
  • 王璐
展开
  • 710032 西安市 空军军医大学第一附属医院皮肤科
张肖莹：女,本科,护师,E-mail：start1yingying@126.com

收稿日期: 2023-10-20

  网络出版日期: 2024-10-21

基金资助

国家自然科学基金（82173410）

收起

The development and validation of two prediction models of skin infection affected with multidrug-resistant organism in patients with pemphigus

  • ZHANG Xiaoying ,
  • LI Baizhang ,
  • FANG Hui ,
  • YANG Tingting ,
  • FENG Jiaxing ,
  • WANG Lu
Expand
  • Department of Dermatology,The First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University,Xi‘an, 710032,China

Received date: 2023-10-20

  Online published: 2024-10-21

Fold

摘要

目的 构建并比较天疱疮患者皮肤多重耐药菌感染Logistic回归模型和分类决策树模型。方法 纳入2015年10月—2023年8月西安市某三级甲等医院收住院的165例天疱疮患者,根据皮肤分泌物培养和药敏结果,将患者分为多重耐药菌组和对照组,比较两组的各项指标并构建Logistic回归预测模型及分类决策树模型,通过区分度（曲线下面积）及准确度（灵敏度、特异度）指标对两种模型进行评价及比较。选择2023年9月—2024年3月住院的42例天疱疮患者对模型进行验证。结果 天疱疮皮肤多重耐药菌感染率为38.8%。Logistic回归模型纳入中性粒细胞绝对值、低蛋白血症及住院季节3个影响因素,模型公式为P=1/[1+exp（-4.168+0.207 × 中性粒细胞绝对值+2.913 × 春季住院+1.256 × 夏季住院+1.508 × 秋季住院+1.340 × 低蛋白血症）];决策树模型纳入中性粒细胞绝对值、系统激素治疗、住院季节3个因素,其中中性粒细胞绝对值是最重要的预测因子。两种模型比较,曲线下面积（0.820和0.795）差异无统计学意义（P=0.438）;Logistic回归模型灵敏度为0.609,特异度为0.871,决策树模型灵敏度为0.422,特异度为0.970。模型验证结果：Logistic回归模型曲线下面积为0.784,灵敏度为0.625,特异度为0.769;决策树模型曲线下面积为0.804,灵敏度为0.500,特异度为0.885。结论 基于Logistic回归和决策树构建的模型均有较好预测效能且二者差异无统计学意义,护理工作中可联合使用两种模型以提高预测准确度。

关键词： 天疱疮; 多重耐药菌; Logistic回归; 决策树; 影响因素分析; 护理

本文引用格式

张肖莹 , 李柏樟 , 方卉 , 杨婷婷 , 冯佳星 , 王璐 . 天疱疮患者皮肤多重耐药菌感染两种预测模型的构建及验证[J]. 中华急危重症护理杂志, 2024 , 5(10) : 882 -888 . DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.2096-7446.2024.10.003

Abstract

Objective To construct and compare Logistic regression model and classification decision tree model of skin infection affected with multidrug-resistant organism（MDRO） in patients with pemphigus. Methods A total of 165 inpatients with pemphigus admitted to a tertiary class A hospital in Xi‘an from October 2015 to August 2023 were included and divided into the MDRO group and the control group according to the results of secretion culture and drug sensitive test from skin lesions. The factors were compared between the two groups and were used to established Logistic regression model and decision tree model. The discrimination（area under the curve） and accuracy（sensitivity and specificity） were committed to evaluate and compare between the two models. The two prediction models were validated by a verification group of 42 patients with pemphigus from September 2023 to March 2024. Results The skin infection rate of MDRO in pemphigus was 38.8%. Absolute neutrophil count （ANC）,hypoproteinemia and season of hospitalization were included in Logistic regression model. The model formula was P=1/[1+exp（-4.168+0.207 × ANC+2.913 × hospitalization in spring+1.256 × hospitalization in summer+1.508 × hospitalization in autumn+1.340 × hypoproteinemia）]. ANC,systemic glucocorticoid treatment and season of hospitalization were included in decision tree model,among which ANC was the most important predictor. There was no significant difference in area under the curve（AUC）（0.820 vs. 0.795） between the two models（P=0.438）. The results of accuracy showed that the sensitivity and the specificity of Logistic regression model was 0.609 and 0.871,and that of decision tree model was 0.422 and 0.970 respectively. The model validation results showed that AUC of Logistic regression model was 0.784,with a sensitivity of 0.625,and a specificity of 0.769 and that AUC of decision tree model was 0.804,with a sensitivity of 0.500,and a specificity of 0.885. Conclusion Both Logistic regression model and decision tree model have good predictive value and there is no significant difference between them. The two models should be combined in nursing application to improve the accuracy of prediction.

Key words： Pemphigus; Multidrug-Resistant Organism; Logistic Regression; Decision Tree; Root Cause Analysis; Nursing Care

参考文献

[1] 中国医师协会皮肤科医师分会,疑难重症及罕见病国家重点实验室,国家皮肤与免疫疾病临床医学研究中心. 天疱疮患者健康教育共识(2023版)[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志,2023:e20230123.
Dermatologist Branch of Chinese Physician Association,National Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases,National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases. Consensus on health education of patients with pemphigus(2023)[J]. Chin J Dermatol,e20230123.
[2] Kridin K,Sagi SZ,Bergman R.Mortality and cause of death in patients with pemphigus[J]. Acta Derm Venereol,2017,97(5):607-611.
[3] 谢媛媛,陈显侠,郑佳媛,等. 天疱疮合并感染患者病原菌分布及耐药性[J]. 中国感染控制杂志,2020,19(4):341-346.
Xie YY,Chen XX,Zheng JY,et al.Distribution and antimicrobial resistance of pathogens in patients with pemphigus and infection[J]. Chin J Infect Contr,2020,19(4):341-346.
[4] 董娟,金芳草,蔡丙杰,等. 天疱疮患者80例临床、病理特点及皮肤感染状况分析[J]. 中国皮肤性病学杂志,2022,36(6):670-674.
Dong J,Jin FC,Cai BJ,et al.Analysis of the clinical,patho-logical characteristics and skin infection status of 680 pa-tients with pemphigus[J]. Chin J Dermatovenereol,2022,36(6):670-674.
[5] 蔡虻,刘聚源,邹琪. 护理在防控多重耐药菌的独特作用[J]. 中国护理管理,2019,19(8):1126-1129.
Cai M,Liu JY,Zou Q.The unique role of nursing in the prevention and control of multidrug-resistant organism[J]. Chin Nurs Manag,2019,19(8):1126-1129.
[6] 李茜,王丽竹,朱祎容,等. ICU患者多重耐药菌感染风险预测模型的构建与验证[J]. 护理与康复,2023,22(2):29-34.
Li Q,Wang LZ,Zhu YR,et al.Construction and validation of risk prediction model for multi-drug resistance organism infection of ICU patients[J]. J Nurs Renabil,2022,22(2):29-34.
[7] Ma YN,Zhang LX,Hu YY,et al.Nomogram model for predicting the risk of multidrug-resistant bacteria infection in diabetic foot patients[J]. Infect Drug Resist,2021,14:627-637.
[8] 李惠琴. 集束化护理在天疱疮创面多重耐药菌感染患者中的应用[J]. 护理实践与研究,2019,16(10):82-83.
Li HQ.Application of cluster nursing in patients with multi-drug resistant bacteria infection of pemphigus wound[J]. Nurs Pract Res,2019,16(10):82-83.
[9] 杨启文,吴安华,胡必杰,等. 临床重要耐药菌感染传播防控策略专家共识[J]. 中国感染控制杂志,2021,20(1):1-14.
Yang QW,Wu AH,Hu BJ,et al.Expert consensus on strategies for the prevention and control of spread of clinically important antimicrobial-resistant organisms[J]. Chin J Infect Contr,2021,20(1):1-14.
[10] 郑小苹,周斐然,李仲华,等. 天疱疮患者合并感染的特征及高危因素分析[J]. 微生物与感染,2023,18(3):157-162.
Zheng XP,Zhou FR,Li ZH,et al.Characteristics and risk factors of infections in pemphigus patients[J]. J Microbes Infect,2023,18(3):157-162.
[11] 张晓,朱冠男,张少龙,等. 182例天疱疮患者合并感染状况的回顾分析[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志,2020,53(1):8-12.
Zhang X,Zhu GN,Zhang SL,et al.Retrospective analysis of 182 cases of pemphigus complicated by infections[J]. Chin J Dermatol,2020,53(1):8-12.
[12] 楼俊晓,何剑萍,何凤玲,等. 天疱疮患者医院感染的相关因素及感染病原菌耐药性分析[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志,2018,28(6):869-871.
Lou JX,He JP,He FL,et al.Related factors for nosocomial infections in patients with pemphigus and drug resistance of pathogens[J]. Chin J Nosocomiol,2018,28(6):869-871.
[13] 刘琼,许贵霞,张思平. 天疱疮患者感染危险因素分析[J]. 中国皮肤性病学杂志,2019,33(7):788-791.
Liu Q,Xu GX,Zhang SP.Risk factors for infection in patients with pemphigus[J]. Chin J Dermatovenereol,2019,33(7):788-791.
[14] 万学红,卢雪峰. 诊断学[M]. 9版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2018:89.
Wan XH,Lu XF.Diagnostics[M]. 9th ed. Beijing:People‘s Medical Publishing House,2018:89.
[15] Soderstrom MA,Blyth DM,Carson ML,et al.Seasonality of microbiology of combat-related wounds and wound infections in Afghanistan[J]. Mil Med,2023,188(Suppl 6):304-310.
[16] 项晶晶. 天疱疮病人皮肤创面多重耐药菌感染的护理[J]. 全科护理,2019,17(10):1214-1215.
Xiang JJ.Nursing care of patients with pemphigus infected with multi-drug resistant bacteria on skin wound[J]. Chin Gen Pract Nurs,2019,17(10):1214-1215.
[17] 晏爱珍,蔡碧珊,江艳,等. 寻常型天疱疮患者低蛋白血症的原因分析及护理对策[J]. 皮肤性病诊疗学杂志,2015,22(2):141-143.
Yan AZ,Cai BS,Jiang Y,et al.Cause analysis and nursing countermeasures of hypoproteinemia in patients with pemphigus vulgaris[J]. J Diagn Ther Derm Venereol,2015,22(2):141-143.
[18] 施跃英,方波. 35例重症天疱疮患者的护理[J]. 中国麻风皮肤病杂志,2017,33(1):48-51.
Shi YY,Fang B.Nursing care of 35 patients with severe pemphigus[J]. China J Lepr Skin Dis,2017,33(1):48-51.
[19] 王祝珺,王小琴. 天疱疮患者使用糖皮质激素健康教育的探讨[J]. 现代医药卫生,2014,30(4):597-598.
Wang ZJ,Wang XQ.Discussion on health education of patients with pemphigus using glucocorticoid[J]. J Mod Med Health,2014,30(4):597-598.
[20] Lin JS,Singh S,Sumski A,et al.Influence of seasonal variability on orthopedic surgical outcomes in pediatric patients:a review of surgical site infections[J]. J Pediatr Orthop B,2022,31(2):e246-e250.
[21] 路若曦,于小平,张芳,等. 天疱疮的中西医局部抗感染治疗进展[J]. 国医论坛,2021,36(1):76-78,80.
Lu RX,Yu XP,Zhang F,et al.Progress in local anti-infection treatment of pemphigus with traditional Chinese and western medicine[J]. Forum Tradit Chin Med,2021,36(1):76-78,80.
[22] 薛候香. 炎症指标对细菌及病毒性皮肤病的诊断意义[D]. 太原:山西医科大学,2022.
Xue HX.Diagnostic significance of inflammatory indexes in bacterial and viral dermatoses[D]. Taiyuan:Shanxi Medical University,2022.
[23] 丁海林,王建李,徐斐翔. 中性粒细胞胞外网状陷阱与多重耐药菌感染对重症肺炎患者预后的影响[J]. 中国临床医学,2022,29(6):921-925.
Ding HL,Wang JL,Xu FX.Effect of neutrophil extracellular traps and multidrug resistant bacteria infection on prognosis of patients with severe pneumonia[J]. Chin J Clin Med,2022,29(6):921-925.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉