ISSN 2097-6046(网络)
ISSN 2096-7446(印刷)
CN 10-1655/R
主管:中国科学技术协会
主办:中华护理学会
论著

ICU患者活动减少型谵妄风险动态列线图预测模型的构建与验证

  • 张欢 ,
  • 甘秀妮 ,
  • 周雯 ,
  • 高燕
展开
  • 400010 重庆市 重庆医科大学附属第二医院护理部
张欢:女,本科(硕士在读),护士,E-mail:2365925389@qq.com

收稿日期: 2024-01-31

  网络出版日期: 2024-06-21

基金资助

重庆市自然科学基金面上项目(CSTB2022NSCQ-MSX0816)

Development and validation of a dynamic nomogram prediction model for hypoactive delirium risk in ICU patients

  • ZHANG Huan ,
  • GAN Xiuni ,
  • ZHOU Wen ,
  • GAO Yan
Expand
  • Department of Nursing,The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University,Chongqing, 400010,China

Received date: 2024-01-31

  Online published: 2024-06-21

摘要

目的 构建ICU患者活动减少型谵妄风险动态列线图预测模型,并验证其预测效果。方法 选取2022年10月—2023年11月重庆市某三级甲等医院ICU患者430例作为研究对象,采用ICU意识模糊评估表联合Richmond躁动-镇静评分进行谵妄评估和分型。通过单因素分析和多因素Logistic回归分析确定独立预测因子,构建动态列线图预测模型。采用受试者操作特征曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)和Hosmer-Lemeshow(H-L)拟合优度检验模型的区分度和校准度,并对模型进行内、外部验证。结果 纳入模型的预测因子为电解质紊乱(OR=2.350)、留置导管≥2根(OR=3.529)、使用利尿剂(OR=0.342)、格拉斯哥昏迷评分(OR=0.183)、C反应蛋白浓度(OR=1.006)、血尿素浓度(OR=1.063)。建模组AUC为0.941(95%CI:0.916~0.966),灵敏度为87.9%,特异度为90.3%,H-L检验结果为P=0.415。验证组AUC为0.897(95%CI:0.837~0.956),灵敏度为79.6%,特异度为86.5%,H-L检验结果为P=0.450。结论 该研究构建的动态列线图预测模型能有效预测ICU患者发生活动减少型谵妄的概率,为医护人员科学预测活动减少型谵妄的发生提供有效工具,且临床使用便捷。

本文引用格式

张欢 , 甘秀妮 , 周雯 , 高燕 . ICU患者活动减少型谵妄风险动态列线图预测模型的构建与验证[J]. 中华急危重症护理杂志, 2024 , 5(6) : 485 -492 . DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.2096-7446.2024.06.001

Abstract

Objective To develop a dynamic nomogram prediction model for hypoactive delirium risk in ICU patients and verify its predicted effect. Methods A total of 430 patients were selected from the ICU of a tertiary Grade A hospital in Chongqing from October 2022 to November 2023. The Confusion Assessment Methodfor Intensive Care Unit and Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale were used for delirium assessment and classification. Independent predictors were determined through univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis,and a dynamic nomogram prediction model was developed. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit were used to test the discrimination and calibration of the model,and the internal and external verification of the model was conducted. Results The predictors were electrolyte disorders(OR=2.350),indwelling catheters≥2(OR=3.529),use of diuretics(OR=0.342),Glasgow Coma Scale score(OR=0.183),concentration of C-reactive protein(OR=1.006),and urea concentration(OR=1.063). In modeling group,the AUC was 0.941(95%CI:0.916~0.966),the sensitivity was 87.9%,the specificity was 90.3%,and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test was P=0.415. In validation group,the AUC was 0.897(95%CI:0.837~0.956),the sensitivity was 79.6%,the specificity was 86.5%,and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test result showed that P=0.450. Conclusion The dynamic nomogram prediction model constructed in this study can effectively predict the probability of hypoactive delirium in ICU patients,providing an effective tool for medical staff to scientifically predict the occurrence of hypoactive delirium,and is convenient for clinical use.

参考文献

[1] Hosker C,Ward D.Hypoactive delirium[J]. BMJ,2017,357:j2047.
[2] Peritogiannis V,Bolosi M,Lixouriotis C,et al.Recent insights on prevalence and corelations of hypoactive delirium[J]. Behav Neurol,2015,2015:416792.
[3] Rosen JH,Bieber E,Matta SE,et al. Hypoactive delirium:differential diagnosis,evaluation,and treatment[J]. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord,2024,26(1):23f03602.
[4] Hayhurst CJ,Marra A,Han JH,et al.Association of hypoactive and hyperactive delirium with cognitive function after critical illness[J]. Crit Care Med,2020,48(6):e480-e488.
[5] Hughes CG,Hayhurst CJ,Pandharipande PP,et al.Association of delirium during critical illness with mortality:multicenter prospective cohort study[J]. Anesth Analg,2021,133(5):1152-1161.
[6] 李思宇,张瑾,田永明,等. ICU意识模糊评估量表在护士评估过程中的准确性调查[J]. 护士进修杂志,2023,38(3):256-258,266.
Li SY,Zhang J,Tian YM,et al.Accuracy investigation of confusion assessment method for the ICU in the evaluation process of nurses[J]. J Nurses Train,2023,38(3):256-258,266.
[7] Krewulak KD,Stelfox HT,Leigh JP,et al.Incidence and prevalence of delirium subtypes in an adult ICU:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Crit Care Med,2018,46(12):2029-2035.
[8] 中华医学会神经病学分会神经心理与行为神经病学学组. 综合医院谵妄诊治中国专家共识(2021)[J]. 中华老年医学杂志,2021,40(10):1226-1233.
Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology Group of the Neurology Branch of the Chinese Medical Association. Chinese experts consensus on diagnosis and treatment of delirium in general hospital(2021)[J]. Chin J Geriatr,2021,40(10):1226-1233.
[9] 叶丽,刘琰,陈静,等. 手术病人术后谵妄风险预测模型的研究进展[J]. 护理研究,2022,36(10):1810-1815.
Ye L,Liu Y,Chen J,et al.Research progress of risk predic-tion models for postoperative delirium in surgical patients[J]. Chin Nurs Res,2022,36(10):1810-1815.
[10] 郑茹春,王建宁,陈洁,等. ICU谵妄亚型评估及护理研究进展[J]. 护理学杂志,2022,37(2):101-104.
Zheng RC,Wang JN,Chen J,et al.Assessment and nursing interventions for delirium subtypes in ICU:a review[J]. J Nurs Sci,2022,37(2):101-104.
[11] Riley RD,Ensor J,Snell KIE,et al.Calculating the sample size required for developing a clinical prediction model[J]. BMJ,2020,368:m441.
[12] Ely EW,Margolin R,Francis J,et al.Evaluation of delirium in critically ill patients:validation of the Confusion Assess-ment Method for the Intensive Care Unit(CAM-ICU)[J]. Crit Care Med,2001,29(7):1370-1379.
[13] Zhang Y,Diao DM,Zhang H,et al.Validity and predictability of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit for delirium among critically ill patients in the intensive care unit:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Nurs Crit Care,2023.
[14] Sessler CN,Gosnell MS,Grap MJ,et al.The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale:validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med,2002,166(10):1338-1344.
[15] 杨雪,王喜今,姜玮,等. Richmond躁动镇静评分量表评估电休克治疗后谵妄的信度及效度[J]. 临床精神医学杂志,2016,26(2):86-88.
Yang X,Wang XJ,Jiang W,et al.Reliability and validity of Richmond agitation-sedation scale on post-electroconvulsive therapy delirium[J]. J Clin Psychiatry,2016,26(2):86-88.
[16] 李雪梅,王欣琦,徐励,等. 脑肿瘤术后ICU患者谵妄亚型的危险因素分析[J]. 解放军护理杂志,2022,39(5):13-17.
Li XM,Wang XQ,Xu L,et al.Analysis the risk factors of delirium subtypes in ICU patients after brain tumor surgery[J]. Nurs J Chin PLA,2022,39(5):13-17.
[17] la Cour KN,Andersen-Ranberg NC,Weihe S,et al. Distribution of delirium motor subtypes in the intensive care unit:a systematic scoping review[J]. Crit Care,2022,26(1):53.
[18] Yu MT,Mi J,Zhang CL,et al.Knowledge,attitude and practice regarding hypoactive delirium among ICU nurses:a nationwide cross-sectional study[J]. Nurse Educ Pract,2023,72:103749.
[19] Wang LH,Jin TT,Zhang XW,et al.Risk factors and prevention for postoperative delirium after orthopedic surgery[J]. Indian J Psychiatry,2021,63(6):554-559.
[20] Hughes CG,Morandi A,Girard TD,et al.Association between endothelial dysfunction and acute brain dysfunction during critical illness[J]. Anesthesiology,2013,118(3):631-639.
[21] Xing JY,Yuan ZY,Jie YQ,et al.Risk factors for delirium:are therapeutic interventions part of it?[J]. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat,2019,15:1321-1327.
[22] 陈俊杉,范杰梅,余金甜,等. 神经外科ICU患者谵妄风险预测模型的构建与验证[J]. 护理学报,2021,28(4):1-8.
Chen JS,Fan JM,Yu JT,et al.Development and validation of delirium prediction model for neurosurgical ICU patients[J]. J Nurs China,2021,28(4):1-8.
[23] Cerejeira J,Firmino H,Vaz-Serra A,et al.The neuroinflammatory hypothesis of delirium[J]. Acta Neuropathol,2010,119(6):737-754.
[24] Park WR,Kim HR,Park JY,et al.Potential usefulness of blood urea nitrogen to creatinine ratio in the prediction and early detection of delirium motor subtype in the intensive care unit[J]. J Clin Med,2022,11(17):5073.
[25] Pang HM,Kumar S,Ely EW,et al.Acute kidney injury-associated delirium:a review of clinical and pathophysiological mechanisms[J]. Crit Care,2022,26(1):258.
[26] 孙建华,郭海凌,孙丹丹,等. 重症患者谵妄评估的现状调查及影响因素分析[J]. 中华护理杂志,2018,53(1):17-21.
Sun JH,Guo HL,Sun DD,et al.Current status and influencing factors of application of the Confusion assessment method for the Intensive Care Unit(CAM-ICU)[J]. Chin J Nurs,2018,53(1):17-21.
文章导航

/

〈 〉