目的 汉化急诊护士压力源量表（Stressor Scale for Emergency Nurses，SSEN）并检验其信效度。 方法 采用Brislin翻译法对英文版急诊护士压力源量表进行直译、 回译及跨文化调适，形成中文版急诊护士压力源量表。 选取30名急诊护士进行预调查，针对调查结果 进行修改后，便利选取北京市8所三级综合医院317名急诊护士进行正式调查，评价量表的信效度。 结果 中文版急诊护士压力源量表包含面临生与死的情况、患者和家属的行为及反 应、技术和正规支持、冲突4个维度，共计24个条目。 量表的内容效度为0.94，各条目内容效度为0.83~1.00；因子分析提取4个公因子，累积方差贡献率76.730%；量表总的Cronbach’s α 系数为0.960， 折半信度为0.840。 结论 中文版急诊护士压力源量表在我国急诊护士中初步检验具有良好的信效度，可以用于中国文化背景下急诊护士压力源测定，有效评估急诊护士的压力状态，并为护理管理人员实施干预提供依据。

Objective To translate and test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Stressor Scale for Emergency Nurses （SSEN）. Methods The Brislin translation method was used to translate the SSEN scale literally，back-translate and cross-culturally adjust to the Chinese version of the SSEN. Thirty emergency nurses were selected for pre-survey，after modifying the survey results，the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of SSEN was tested among 317 emergency nurses by convenient sampling in several tertiary general hospitals in in Beijing. Results The Chinese version of SSEN includes life and death situation，patients’ andfamilies’ actions and reactions，technical and formal support，conflicts，total 4 dimensions，24 items. The Scale-Content Validity Index（S-CVI） was 0.94，and Item-Content Validity Index（I-CVI） was 0.83 to 1.00. Four common factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis，and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 76.730%. The Cronbach’s α for the total scale was 0.960，and the split-half reliability was 0.840. Conclusion The Chinese version of SSEN has acceptable reliability and validity，It can be used to measure the pressure source of emergency nurses， effectively evaluate the pressure state of emergency nurses，and provide a basis for nursing managers to intervene.