ISSN 2097-6046(网络)
ISSN 2096-7446(印刷)
CN 10-1655/R
主管:中国科学技术协会
主办:中华护理学会
综述

缺血性脑卒中后认知障碍风险预测模型的范围综述

  • 赵婉辰 ,
  • 张慧 ,
  • 方一帆 ,
  • 马聪 ,
  • 郭娜
展开
  • 1 中国医学科学研究院北京协和医院护理部 北京市 100730
    2 中国医学科学研究院北京协和医院组织处 北京市 100730
赵婉辰:女,本科(硕士在读),E-mail:1640182890@qq.com
第一联系人:

赵婉辰:整理并分析数据、论文撰写;张慧、方一帆:整理数据;马聪:对文章的知识性内容作批评性审阅;郭娜:获取研究经费、指导

*郭娜,E-mail:guonauss@163.com

收稿日期: 2025-08-10

  网络出版日期: 2026-06-02

基金资助

北京协和医院临研专项(2022-PUMCH-B-031)

A scoping review of risk prediction models for cognitive impairment after ischemic stroke

  • ZHAO Wanchen ,
  • ZHANG Hui ,
  • FANG Yifan ,
  • MA Cong ,
  • GUO Na
Expand
  • 1 Department of NursingPeking Union Medical College Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesBeijing 100730, China
    2 Organizational DepartmentPeking Union Medical College Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesBeijing 100730, China

Received date: 2025-08-10

  Online published: 2026-06-02

Supported by

Peking Union Medical College Hospital Clinical Research Special Project(2022-PUMCH-B-031)

摘要

目的 对国内外缺血性脑卒中后认知障碍风险预测模型进行范围综述,为临床护理实践及后续研究提供参考与借鉴。 方法 全面检索9个中英文数据库,检索时限为建库至2025年3月2日,提取缺血性脑卒中后认知障碍的发生率、模型纳入的预测因子、建模方法及性能指标并进行汇总分析。 结果 共纳入24项研究,缺血性脑卒中后认知障碍的发生率为30.4%~57.4%。每项研究纳入的预测因子数目为1~17个不等,其中年龄和教育水平为出现频次最高的预测因子。模型的构建方式为Logistic回归和机器学习。纳入模型的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(Area Under the Curve,AUC)为0.65~0.98。 结论 现有模型普遍具有高偏倚风险且性能差异大,未来应通过合理纳入预测因子、妥善处理缺失数据、加强内部验证和外部验证等途径综合提升模型质量。

本文引用格式

赵婉辰 , 张慧 , 方一帆 , 马聪 , 郭娜 . 缺血性脑卒中后认知障碍风险预测模型的范围综述[J]. 中华急危重症护理杂志, 2026 , 7(6) : 755 -763 . DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.2096-7446.2026.06.020

Abstract

Objective To conduct a scoping review of risk prediction models for cognitive impairment after ischemic stroke both domestically and internationally,aiming to provide references for clinical nursing practice and subsequent research. Methods A comprehensive search was conducted in 9 Chinese and English databases from the establishment of the databases to March 2,2025. The incidence of cognitive impairment after ischemic stroke,the predictive factors included in the models,the modeling methods,and performance indicators were extracted and summarized. Results A total of 24 studies were included. The incidence of cognitive impairment after ischemic stroke ranged from 30.4% to 57.4%. The number of predictive factors included in each study ranged from 1 to 17,with age and education level were the most frequently included factors. The modeling methods were logistic regression and machine learning. The area under the curve(AUC) values of the included models ranged from 0.65 to 0.98. Conclusion The existing models generally have a high risk of bias and significant performance differences. In the future,the quality of models should be comprehensively enhanced through reasonable inclusion of predictive factors,proper handling of missing data,and strengthening of internal validation and external validation.

参考文献

[1] 中华医学会, Chinese Medical Journals Publishing House,Chinese Society of General Practice, 等. 早搏基层诊疗指南(2019年)[J]. 中华全科医师杂志, 2020, 19(7):561-566.
  Chinese Medical Association, Chinese Medical Journals Publishing House,Chinese Society of General Practice, et al. Guideline for primary care of extrasystole(2019)[J]. Chin J Gen Pract, 2020, 19(7):561-566.
[2] 覃心如, 邹伟, 王穆. 中国居民1990—2019年缺血性脑卒中发病和死亡趋势年龄-时期-队列分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2023, 39(8):1024-1031.
  Qin XR, Zou W, Wang M. Incidence and mortality of ischemic stroke in China,1990-2019:an age-period-cohort analysis[J]. Chin J Public Health, 2023, 39(8):1024-1031.
[3] 夏得月, 王清, 蒋园园, 等. 脑卒中后认知障碍风险预测工具的范围综述[J]. 中国护理管理, 2023, 23(8):1238-1244.
  Xia DY, Wang Q, Jiang YY, et al. Risk prediction tools for post-stroke cognitive impairment:a scoping review[J]. Chin Nurs Manag, 2023, 23(8):1238-1244.
[4] 崔倩, 李瑞玲, 栗文娟, 等. 《脑卒中后认知障碍》指南解读[J]. 护理研究, 2022, 36(22):3949-3952.
  Cui Q, Li RL, Li WJ, et al. Interpretation of guideline on “post stroke cognitive impairment”[J]. Chin Nurs Res, 2022, 36(22):3949-3952.
[5] Selmer N, Berthelsen C, van Grootven B, et al. Identifying risk prediction models and predictors for hospital readmission in patients with medical conditions:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2025, 171:105188.
[6] 陈香萍, 张奕, 庄一渝, 等. PROBAST:诊断或预后多因素预测模型研究偏倚风险的评估工具[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2020, 20(6):737-744.
  Chen XP, Zhang Y, Zhuang YY, et al. PROBAST:a tool for assessing risk of bias in the study of diagnostic or prognostic multi-factorial predictive models[J]. Chin J Evid Based Med, 2020, 20(6):737-744.
[7] 顾福一, 黄维英, 熊长贵, 等. 急性脑梗死患者并发认知功能障碍的风险预测Nomogram模型构建[J]. 神经损伤与功能重建, 2025, 20(1):12-16,56.
  Gu FY, Huang WY, Xiong CG, et al. Construction of nomogram model for predicting the risk of cognitive impairment in patients with acute cerebral infarction[J]. Neural Inj Funct Reconstr, 2025, 20(1):12-16,56.
[8] 杨训娟, 顾正义, 丁晴, 等. 轻度急性缺血性脑卒中患者早期发生卒中后认知障碍的风险预测列线图模型构建[J]. 实用心脑肺血管病杂志, 2025, 33(4):38-44.
  Yang XJ, Gu ZY, Ding Q, et al. Construction of nomogram model for predicting risk of the early post-stroke cognitive impairment in patients with mild acute ischaemic stroke[J]. Pract J Card Cereb Pneumal Vasc Dis, 2025, 33(4):38-44.
[9] Wei M, Zhu XF, Yang X, et al. Development and validation of a novel model to predict post-stroke cognitive impairment within 6 months after acute ischemic stroke[J]. Front Neurol, 2024, 15:1451786.
[10] Zhang JQ, Kong ZH, Hong SL, et al. Machine learning-based model for prediction of post-stroke cognitive impairment in acute ischemic stroke:a cross-sectional study[J]. Neurol India, 2024, 72(6):1193-1198.
[11] Wei CX, Zhai WJ, Zhao PP, et al. Plasma fibrinogen as a po-tential biomarker of cognitive impairment after acute ischemic stroke[J]. Sci Rep, 2024, 14(1):32120.
[12] Yang X, Wei M, Chen P, et al. Predicting poststroke cognitive impairment after acute ischemic stroke based on admission characteristics[J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2024, 33(12):108082.
[13] Chu M, Luo YH, Wang DS, et al. Prediction of poststroke cog-nitive impairment based on the systemic inflammatory res-ponse index[J]. Brain Behav, 2024, 14(1):e3372.
[14] 姬燕梅, 李文俊, 李青芸, 等. 急性缺血性脑卒中后认知障碍相关因素分析及列线图模型构建[J]. 昆明医科大学学报, 2024, 45(5):73-81.
  Ji YM, Li WJ, Li QY, et al. The analysis of related factors of cognitive impairment after the acute ischemic stroke and construction of nomogram model[J]. J Kunming Med Univ, 2024, 45(5):73-81.
[15] 陈昕灏, 田君, 刘德志, 等. 首发缺血性脑卒中后患者认知障碍风险预测模型的构建与验证[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2024, 39(24):2600-2607.
  Chen XH, Tian J, Liu DZ, et al. Construction and validation of a predictive model for cognitive impairment risk in patients with first ischemic stroke[J]. J Nurses Train, 2024, 39(24):2600-2607.
[16] Pan CS, Chen GH, Jing P, et al. Incremental value of stroke-induced structural disconnection in predicting global cognitive impairment after stroke[J]. Stroke, 2023, 54(5):1257-1267.
[17] Lee M, Hong Y, An S, et al. Machine learning-based predic-tion of post-stroke cognitive status using electroencephalogra-phy-derived brain network attributes[J]. Front Aging Neurosci, 2023, 15:1238274.
[18] Ji WC, Wang CJ, Chen HQ, et al. Predicting post-stroke cogni-tive impairment using machine learning:a prospective cohort study[J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2023, 32(11):107354.
[19] Lee M, Yeo NY, Ahn HJ, et al. Prediction of post-stroke cog-nitive impairment after acute ischemic stroke using machine learning[J]. Alzheimers Res Ther, 2023, 15(1):147.
[20] 封海霞, 张莉, 刘畅, 等. 基于主成分分析法的脑卒中后轻度认知障碍风险预测模型研究[J]. 现代医学, 2023, 51(10):1386-1391.
  Feng HX, Zhang L, Liu C, et al. Study on risk prediction model for post-stroke mild cognitive impairment based on principal component analysis method[J]. Mod Med J, 2023, 51(10):1386-1391.
[21] 沈延鑫, 尚天玲, 魏春晓, 等. 预测卒中后认知障碍风险列线图的开发和验证[J]. 中风与神经疾病杂志, 2023, 40(7):606-611.
  Shen YX, Shang TL, Wei CX, et al. Development and valida-tion of a nomogram for predicting the risk of post-stroke cognitive impairment[J]. J Apoplexy Nerv Dis, 2023, 40(7):606-611.
[22] Tang AQ, Liu SJ, Wang Z, et al. A new nomogram model for individualized prediction of cognitive impairment in patients with acute ischemic stroke[J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2022, 31(7):106515.
[23] 陈尚超, 胡明艳, 徐向勇. 急性脑卒中后血清因子变化对患者认知障碍预测模型的构建分析[J]. 心脑血管病防治, 2022, 22(3):9-12,30.
  Chen SC, Hu MY, Xu XY. Construction and analysis of the prediction model of cognitive impairment of patients with the changes of serum factors after acute stroke[J]. Prev Treat Car-dio Cereb Vasc Dis, 2022, 22(3):9-12,30.
[24] Yuan XL, Zhang L, Sui RB, et al. A risk prediction model of post-stroke cognitive impairment based on magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging[J]. Neurol Res, 2021, 43(8):642-652.
[25] Dong Y, Ding MY, Cui M, et al. Development and validation of a clinical model(DREAM-LDL) for post-stroke cognitive impairment at 6 months[J]. Aging, 2021, 13(17):21628-21641.
[26] Gong L, Wang HC, Zhu XF, et al. Nomogram to predict cogni-tive dysfunction after a minor ischemic stroke in hospita-lized-population[J]. Front Aging Neurosci, 2021, 13:637363.
[27] Weaver NA, Kuijf HJ, Aben HP, et al. Strategic infarct locations for post-stroke cognitive impairment:a pooled analysis of in-dividual patient data from 12 acute ischaemic stroke cohorts[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2021, 20(6):448-459.
[28] Ding MY, Xu Y, Wang YZ, et al. Predictors of cognitive im-pairment after stroke:a prospective stroke cohort study[J]. J Alzheimers Dis, 2019, 71(4):1139-1151.
[29] Chander RJ, Lam BYK, Lin XL, et al. Development and vali-dation of a risk score(CHANGE) for cognitive impairment after ischemic stroke[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1):12441.
[30] Kandiah N, Chander RJ, Lin XL, et al. Cognitive impairment after mild stroke:development and validation of the SIGNAL2 risk score[J]. J Alzheimers Dis, 2016, 49(4):1169-1177.
[31] 幸超群, 严艳, 王洁, 等. 缺血性脑卒中患者早期非偏瘫侧渐进式抗阻运动方案的构建及效果研究[J]. 中华急危重症护理杂志, 2025, 6(7):773-779.
  Xing CQ, Yan Y, Wang J, et al. Construction and effect re-search of early progressive resistance exercise program for the non-hemiplegic side in ischemic stroke patients[J]. Chin J Emerg Crit Care Nurs, 2025, 6(7):773-779.
[32] Zhang BY, Sun QX, Lv YM, et al. Influencing factors for de-cision-making delay in seeking medical care among acute ischemic stroke patients in rural areas[J]. Patient Educ Couns, 2023, 108:107614.
[33] 汪赛, 刘艺, 樊雅玲, 等. 基于Teach-back理论指导下的健康教育模式对缺血性脑卒中患者知识教育水平及依从性的影响[J]. 中医药临床杂志, 2023, 35(12):2409-2413.
  Wang S, Liu Y, Fan YL, et al. Effect of Teach-back based health education model on knowledge education level and compliance of patients with ischemic stroke[J]. Clin J Tradit Chin Med, 2023, 35(12):2409-2413.
[34] 张杰, 席崇程, 孔云, 等. 脑卒中后认知障碍风险预测模型的系统评价[J]. 护理研究, 2024, 38(10):1726-1733.
  Zhang J, Xi CC, Kong Y, et al. Risk prediction models for post-stroke cognitive impairment:a systematic review[J]. Chin Nurs Res, 2024, 38(10):1726-1733.
[35] 邓建新, 单路宝, 贺德强, 等. 缺失数据的处理方法及其发展趋势[J]. 统计与决策, 2019, 35(23):28-34.
  Deng JX, Shan LB, He DQ, et al. Processing method of missing data and its developing tendency[J]. Stat Decis, 2019, 35(23):28-34.
[36] 安晓, 江淑敏. ICU患者亚谵妄综合征风险预测模型的系统评价[J]. 中华急危重症护理杂志, 2025, 6(7):866-871.
  An X, Jiang SM. Risk prediction models for subsyndromal delirium in ICU patients:a systematic review[J]. Chin J Emerg Crit Care Nurs, 2025, 6(7):866-871.
文章导航

/