ISSN 2097-6046(网络)
ISSN 2096-7446(印刷)
CN 10-1655/R
主管:中国科学技术协会
主办:中华护理学会
论著

不同性别ICU患者ICU后综合征各领域症状的纵向关系研究

  • 张立文 ,
  • 董春利 ,
  • 崔翔宇 ,
  • 张文博 ,
  • 高泷
展开
  • 1 济宁医学院附属医院重症医学科 山东省济宁市 272000
    2 山东第一医科大学护理学院 泰安市 271016
    3 滕州市中心人民医院呼吸重症监护室 山东省枣庄市 277599
    4 南昌大学江西医学院护理学院 南昌市 330019
张立文:男,本科,副主任护师,护士长,E-mail:zhangliwen429@163.com
第一联系人:

张立文:实施研究、论文撰写、经费支持;董春利:实施研究、数据整理;崔翔宇:实施研究、统计学分析;张文博:数据整理;高泷:研究指导、论文修改

*高泷,E-mail:gaosx0707@163.com

收稿日期: 2025-06-23

  网络出版日期: 2026-06-02

基金资助

济宁市重点研发项目(软科学项目)(2020JNZC034)

A longitudinalstudy on the symptoms of post-intensive care syndrome domains in ICU patients of different genders

  • ZHANG Liwen ,
  • DONG Chunli ,
  • CUI Xiangyu ,
  • ZHANG Wenbo ,
  • GAO Shuang
Expand
  • 1 Intensive Care UnitAffiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University,JiningShandong province 272000, China
    2 School of NursingShandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical SciencesTaian 271016, China
    3 Respiratory Intensive Care UnitTengzhou Central People’s Hospital,ZaozhuangShandong province 277599, China
    4 School of NursingJiangxi Medical College,Nanchang UniversityNanchang 330019, China
*GAO Shuang,gaosx0707@163.com

Received date: 2025-06-23

  Online published: 2026-06-02

Supported by

Jining Key Research and Development Project(Soft Science Project)(2020JNZC034)

摘要

目的 在性别视角下,调查ICU患者转出ICU后3个月内ICU后综合征(post-intensive care syndrome,PICS)认知、生理、心理领域功能障碍的纵向关系,明确性别的调节作用。 方法 采用便利抽样法,选取2023年9月—2024年2月在山东省某三级甲等医院内科、外科ICU收治并成功转出的584例危重症患者作为研究对象,按性别进行分组,对其转出ICU后1个月(T1)和3个月(T2)的认知、生理、心理功能障碍状况进行评估。构建交叉滞后模型探索PICS 3个领域的纵向关系及性别差异。 结果 两次随访的PICS严重程度有下降趋势(Z=-7.431,P<0.01),且该趋势在不同性别群体中一致。认知、生理、心理功能障碍之间的纵向关系通过自回归效应稳定维持(β=0.55、0.51、0.39),认知、生理、心理功能障碍水平在两次评估中均呈正相关。交叉滞后模型分析显示,T1时的认知功能障碍对T2时的生理功能障碍的预测作用在男女群体中均有具有统计学意义。T1时的生理功能障碍对T2时的认知和心理功能障碍的预测仅在男性中有统计学意义。 结论 ICU患者转出ICU后3个月内的认知、生理、心理功能障碍在不同性别中有不同的纵向关系。基于性别对ICU患者进行早期、针对性的干预可有效预防后期功能障碍的发生、维持和恶化。

本文引用格式

张立文 , 董春利 , 崔翔宇 , 张文博 , 高泷 . 不同性别ICU患者ICU后综合征各领域症状的纵向关系研究[J]. 中华急危重症护理杂志, 2026 , 7(6) : 653 -659 . DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.2096-7446.2026.06.002

Abstract

Objective From a gender perspective,to investigate the longitudinal relationships between cognitive,physical,and psychological dysfunction of post-intensive care syndrome(PICS)among ICU survivors within 3 months after being transferred out of the ICU,and clarify the moderating role of gender. Methods 584 critically ill patients transferred from medical and surgical ICUs of a tertiary grade-A hospital in Shandong Province(September 2023-February 2024) was included by convenient sampling. They were grouped by gender,and their cognitive,physical,and psychological dysfunction were assessed at 1 month (T1) and 3 months (T2) post-ICU discharge. A cross-hysteresis model was constructed to explore the longitudinal relationship and gender difference between the three domains of PICS. Results The severity of PICS at the two follow-ups showed a downward trend(Z=-7.431,P <0.01),and this trend was consistent among different gender groups. Autoregressive effects stably maintained longitudinal relationships among the three dysfunctions(β=0.55,0.51,0.39),with positive correlations observed at both time points. Cross-lagged analysis revealed that T1 cognitive impairment significantly predicted T2 physical impairment in both male and female groups. T1 physical impairment significantly predicted T2 cognitive and psychological impairments only in males. Conclusion Longitudinal relationships between cognitive,physical,and psychological impairments vary by sex within 3 months post-ICU discharge. Early and targeted interventions based on gender for ICU patients can effectively prevent the occurrence,maintenance,and deterioration of functional disorders in the later stages.

参考文献

[1] Needham DM, Davidson J, Cohen H, et al. Improving long-term outcomes after discharge from intensive care unit:report from a stakeholders’ conference[J]. Crit Care Med, 2012, 40(2):502-509.
[2] 何曼曼, 江智霞, 张芳, 等. ICU后综合征患者症状特征的潜在类别分析[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(10):1445-1452.
  He MM, Jiang ZX, Zhang F, et al. Latent class analysis of symptom characteristics in patients with post-intensive care syndrome[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2021, 56(10):1445-1452.
[3] Ma LN. Depression,anxiety,and apathy in mild cognitive impairment:current perspectives[J]. Front Aging Neurosci, 2020, 12:9.
[4] Merdji H, Long MT, Ostermann M, et al. Sex and gender differences in intensive care medicine[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2023, 49(10):1155-1167.
[5] 程志强, 张宝珍, 李夏欣, 等. 危重症患者ICU后心理功能障碍发生率及危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 军事护理, 2023, 40(8):77-81.
  Cheng ZQ, Zhang BZ, Li XX, et al. Incidence and risk factors of post-ICU psychological dysfunction in critically ill patients:a meta-analysis[J]. Mil Nurs, 2023, 40(8):77-81.
[6] Son YJ, Song HS, Seo EJ. Gender differences regarding the impact of change in cognitive function on the functional status of intensive care unit survivors:a prospective cohort study[J]. J Nurs Scholarsh, 2020, 52(4):406-415.
[7] Nari F, Jang BN, Youn HM, et al. Frailty transitions and cognitive function among South Korean older adults[J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1):10658.
[8] Tan S, Sohrabi HR, Weinborn M, et al. Effects of testosterone supplementation on separate cognitive domains in cognitively healthy older men:a meta-analysis of current randomized clinical trials[J]. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry, 2019, 27(11):1232-1246.
[9] Seifart C, Riera Knorrenschild J, Hofmann M, et al. Let us talk about death:gender effects in cancer patients’ preferences for end-of-life discussions[J]. Support Care Cancer, 2020, 28(10):4667-4675.
[10] Burant CJ. A methodological note:an introduction to autore-gressive models[J]. Int J Aging Hum Dev, 2022, 95(4):516-522.
[11] Kawakami D, Fujitani S, Morimoto T, et al. Prevalence of post-intensive care syndrome among Japanese intensive care unit patients:a prospective,multicenter,observational J-PICS study[J]. Crit Care, 2021, 25(1):69.
[12] 胥彦, 李超平. 追踪研究在组织行为学中的应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(4):600-610.
  Xu Y, Li CP. Application of longitudinal study in organizational behavior research[J]. Adv Psychol Sci, 2019, 27(4):600-610.
[13] Rn SL, Rn XW, Rn CL, et al. Screening for post-intensive care syndrome:validation of the healthy aging brain care monitor self-report Chinese version[J]. Nurs Crit Care, 2024, 29(4):824-829.
[14] Renner C, Jeitziner MM, Albert M, et al. Guideline on multimodal rehabilitation for patients with post-intensive care syndrome[J]. Crit Care, 2023, 27(1):301.
[15] Cheung GW, Rensvold RB. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance[J]. Struct Equ Model A Multidiscip J, 2002, 9(2):233-255.
[16] Gao S, Liang XF, Lyu YN, et al. Prevalence of and risk factors analysis for post-intensive care syndrome among survivors of critical care during 3-month longitudinal follow-up[J]. Nurs Crit Care, 2025, 30(5):e13242.
[17] Geense WW, Zegers M, Peters MAA, et al. New physical,mental,and cognitive problems 1 year after ICU admission:a pro-spective multicenter study[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2021, 203(12):1512-1521.
[18] Vincent A, Beck K, Thommen E, et al. Post-intensive care syndrome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients:a prospective observational cohort study[J]. PLoS One, 2022, 17(10):e0276011.
[19] Proffitt T, Menzies V, Grap MJ, et al. Cognitive impairment,physical impairment,and psychological symptoms in intensive care unit survivors[J]. Am J Crit Care, 2023, 32(6):410-420.
[20] Kim GS, Kim N, Won CW, et al. Cross-lagged panel analysis between physical frailty,cognitive function,and falls by sex[J]. J Am Med Dir Assoc, 2023, 24(10):1541-1548.e1.
[21] James KA, Stromin JI, Steenkamp N, et al. Understanding the relationships between physiological and psychosocial stress,cortisol and cognition[J]. Front Endocrinol, 2023, 14:1085950.
[22] Desai P, Halloway S, Krueger KR, et al. Temporal patterns of change in physical and cognitive performance[J]. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 2024, 79(3):glad274.
[23] Dansereau A, Hunter SW, Gomez F, et al. Global cognition predicts the incidence of poor physical performance among older adults:a cross-national study[J]. Geriatr Gerontol Int, 2020, 20(3):218-222.
[24] Anesi GL, Liu VX, Chowdhury M, et al. Association of ICU admission and outcomes in sepsis and acute respiratory failure[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2022, 205(5):520-528.
[25] Sekino N, Selim M, Shehadah A. Sepsis-associated brain injury:underlying mechanisms and potential therapeutic strategies for acute and long-term cognitive impairments[J]. J Neuroinflammation, 2022, 19(1):101.
[26] Nerobkova N, Park YS, Park EC, et al. Frailty transition and depression among community-dwelling older adults:the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging(2006-2020)[J]. BMC Geriatr, 2023, 23(1):148.
[27] Orlas CP, Herrera-Escobar JP, Hau KM, et al. Perceived social support is strongly associated with recovery after injury[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2021, 91(3):552-558.
文章导航

/