收稿日期: 2025-06-05
网络出版日期: 2026-04-02
基金资助
兰州大学第一医院院内科研基金项目(ldyyyn2021-118)
Construction and applicability analysis of a training system for nurses in rapid response teams
Received date: 2025-06-05
Online published: 2026-04-02
Supported by
The First Hospital of Lanzhou University Intramural Research Grant Program(ldyyyn2021-118)
目的 构建规范统一的快速反应小组（rapid response team，RRT）护士培训体系，为RRT护士培训提供参考。 方法 通过文献检索、半结构式访谈初步拟定RRT护士培训体系草案，采用德尔菲法对18名专家进行2轮专家咨询，确立培训体系。 结果 2轮专家咨询问卷有效回收率分别为90%、100%，专家权威系数为0.905，Kendall’s W协调系数为0.346、0.407（P<0.05）。最终确立的RRT培训体系包括5个一级指标、22个二级指标及84个三级指标。 结论 该研究构建的RRT护士培训体系具有较高的科学性和可靠性，为RRT护士培训提供理论支持与实践指导，进一步推动RRT在临床的广泛应用。
陈闪 , 樊落 , 张志刚 , 樊凯盛 , 刘路玲 , 汪袁云子 . 快速反应小组护士培训体系的构建及适用性分析[J]. 中华急危重症护理杂志, 2026 , 7(4) : 419 -424 . DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.2096-7446.2026.04.005
Objective To establish a standardized training system for nurses in rapid response teams（RRT），to provide a reference for RRT nurse training. Methods A preliminary RRT nurse training system draft was developed through literature review and semi-structured interviews. Then two rounds of expert consultation with 18 experts were conducted using the Delphi method to finally determine the training system. Results The questionnaire recovery rate was 90% and 100%，the expert authority coefficient was 0.905，and Kendall’s W coordination coefficient is 0.346 and 0.407（P<0.05） The RRT training system was finally established，including 5 first-level indicators，22 second-level indicators and 84 third-level indicators. Conclusion The RRT nurse training system built in this study is highly scientific and reliable，providing theoretical support and practical guidance for RRT nurse training，and further promoting the wide application of RRT in clinical practice.
Key words： Rapid Response Team; Patient Safety; Simulation Training; Delphi Technique
| [1] | 章莉丽, 叶小云, 陈维娅, 等. 某大型公立医院多院区门诊服务同质化管理实践[J]. 中华医院管理杂志, 2023, 39(11):816-820. |
| Zhang LL, Ye XY, Chen WY, et al. Practice of multi-campus homoge-neous management of outpatient services at a large public hospital[J]. Chin J Hosp Adm, 2023, 39(11):816-820. | |
| [2] | Paquay M, Kolbe M, Klenkenberg S, et al. Comparative analysis of routine clinical debriefings and incident reports:insights for patient safety and teamwork enhancement[J]. Int J Qual Health Care, 2025, 37(1):mzaf010. |
| [3] | 陈闪, 樊落, 吉莉, 等. 快速反应小组护士培训研究进展及启示[J]. 中华急危重症护理杂志, 2024, 5(11):1014-1018. |
| Chen S, Fan L, Ji L, et al. Research progress and enlightenment on nursing training of rapid response team[J]. Chin J Emerg Crit Care Nurs, 2024, 5(11):1014-1018. | |
| [4] | Boniatti MM, Azzolini N, Viana MV, et al. Delayed medical emergency team calls and associated outcomes[J]. Crit Care Med, 2014, 42(1):26-30. |
| [5] | Reardon PM, Fernando SM, Murphy K, et al. Factors associated with delayed rapid response team activation[J]. J Crit Care, 2018, 46:73-78. |
| [6] | 钱萍, 张秋霞, 泮燕红, 等. 神经外科快速反应小组启动延迟的影响因素及改进策略[J]. 中华急危重症护理杂志, 2023, 4(3):258-262. |
| Qian P, Zhang QX, Pan YH, et al. Influencing factors and countermeasures of delayed rapid response team activation in Neurosurgery Department[J]. Chin J Emerg Crit Care Nurs, 2023, 4(3):258-262. | |
| [7] | Alhazzani W, Evans L, Alshamsi F, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign guidelines on the management of adults with coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19) in the ICU:first update[J]. Crit Care Med, 2021, 49(3):e219-e234. |
| [8] | McNeill MM, Archer S, Remsburg D, et al. Rapid response team-quality champion registered nurse:observations and perceptions[J]. J Nurs Care Qual, 2019, 34(4):325-329. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |